Re: How low can you sink? [WAS: Re: HAARP: High Frequency Active

On May 18, 1:46=A0pm, "Tom Checksmix" <cereal_...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Let me tell you
> something, Stephen, nobody gives a rat's ass about your views concerning
> homo***uals. =A0Keep them to yourself if you don't want to be
marginalized=
 as
> a crank. =A0

I think the nature of homo***uality is im****tant to the left, because
of the adaptations to it. Im****tant for the same reason as a position
on the nature of conspirativism. If you think I care about being
marginalized, you understand nothing of my motives. Why would you,
when you don't even grasp my positions themselves?

But as to whether "nobody" gives a rat's ass about these opinions, it
seems to me they are the only positions I express on apst that
_anybody_ does give a rat's ass about. It brought your sorry ass back,
Watson, and it is causing Holmes and Walters to consider leaving, even
though they refuse even to define the violation that this discussion
commits. That's an awful lot of caring, if for the wrong reasons. It
would be well to investigate the special place homo***ual psychopaths
hold in the hearts of so-called leftists.

You are wrong, by the way, about similarities between my views and
those of closeted (and moralistic) homo***uals. Their reaction is
characterized by a sense of ***ual disgust and personal affront. I
think homo***uals are just invariably narcissitic personalities--
essentially, psychopaths. While I defend this view theoretically, in
fact its strongest sup****t comes from extensive personal observation,
in clinical settings and elsewhere. Homo***uals are actually less
odious if they are given and use their liberty to do what they wish
***ually. Their personality constellation is what is despicable.

srd