Re: How low can you sink? [WAS: Re: HAARP: High Frequency Active

On May 18, 1:53=A0pm, "Tom Checksmix" <cereal_...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "stephen" <srdiam...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:49ce2063-b7da-4c2c-b943-6c6859f8f9f9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > On the point of defining limits, Holmes would not obviously proscribe
> > defense of the reactionary Ron Paul campaign as a fit topic. But the
> > nature of homo***uality and its role in socialism is an "atrocity."
> > Discussing personal attitudes toward criminal behavior and its
> > relation to Marxism is too scary for John. Discussing the icl position
> > on executive elections is too _uncertain_ for him. (Meaning, when he
> > disagrees with the icl, there will be no discussion.)
>
> > How can Holmes's stance be categorized as anything but the most
> > loathsomesly cringing suck up to bourgeois respectability and
> > intellectual cowardice?
>
> > srd
>
> The guy who throws the stinkbomb talks about manners. =A0HAHAHA!!!

You think this is about manners?

srd