Re: How low can you sink? [WAS: Re: HAARP: High Frequency Active

On May 18, 2:43=A0pm, "Tom Checksmix" <cereal_...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> ~~~~~~~~Perhaps civility, then. =A0You're a jerk, and pretending to be a
> socialist doesn't remove any of the jerkdom, you're still a jerk.


Well, that's a strange one, civility. Holmes and Walters,
pusillanimous pseudo-socialists, charge I committed a *political*
atrocity whose boundaries they refuse to define. It is simply self-
evident to these cretinous post-reformists. At least I understand
their general point. But what does civility have to do with it? That
what I am saying personally offends homo***uals participating in this
discussion? That's how civility, normally construed, would fit in.
Apart from the irrelevance of this consideration, I was unaware there
were such participants currently. The anti-conspirativism could be
deemed uncivil to vngelis, I suppose. Nobody seemed to object, except
Holmes, who in fact added a wholly gratuitious personal insult
directed toward vngelis. So much for the objectivity of the craven
pseudo-socialists.

Strange also to justify your misrepresentation by the target's lack of
civility. It shows some lack of sense of pro****tion.

srd