John Holmes maintains that there are a class of verbal atrocities that
may be committed on apst, and committing such atrocities should lead
posters to question their participation. This shows a lack of sense of
pro****tion that rivals "Chexsmith." Holmes prioritizes avoiding word
crimes ahead of political clarification. What is im****tant to Holmes
is the regularity of his digestive system and the purity of his sense
of sanctimoniousness. He imposes these spurous values whenever the
chance occurs, from atrocity-daiting to racist-baiting.
Whether Holmes likes it or not, this topic itself deserves discussion.
srd