Re: HAARP: High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program

On May 19, 3:46=A0am, stephen <srdiam...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 17, 3:21=A0pm, dusty <trackdu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > Clinical eh?
>
> > What would you recommend Doc? Pre-frontal lobotomy, shock therapy or
> > just large dodes of the latest chemotherapeutant?
>
> What do YOU recommend for homo***uals, since I think you approximately
> share my views on that category? Even under modern bourgeois
> democracies, the =A0presence of even overt psychosis does not justify
> imposing treatment. The issue here is to protect socialism from
> adaptation to those who purposes are necessarily sectarian in the
> extreme, as Engels recognized with respect to homo***uality.
>
> srd
>
>
>
>
>
> > And for those who, who despite all the evidence for the possibility of
> > conspiracy are annoyingly obtuse in admitting the possibility of it?
>
> > I think a second opinion is called for. Calling Dr DF...Dr DF!- Hide
quo=
ted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Apologies if my post came out as indicating that you had any
inclination at all as to the appropriatness such treatment for
homo***uals. You already responded negatively to David's question as
to whether Vngelis was a homo***ual.

But I was disgusted by your clear inference that Vngelis was mentally
sick - and that was my way of attempting to discredit such THEORY on
the matter that you expounded. You cannot deny that the horrific cycle
of treatments, all justified by reference to a body of theory much of
it still in practice today is on the record. I don't like the use of -
what I consider - a dubious science to provide an answer for
essentially political questions - particularly, but not exclusively,
when the victim is Vngelis.