Re: How low can you sink? [WAS: Re: HAARP: High Frequency Active

On May 18, 5:37=A0pm, Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> On 2008-05-19 02:06 +0100, dusty allegedly wrote:
>
> > But what an individual does in bed with a consenting adult human being
> > is his own business - if a socialist he belongs, if he so choses, in a
> > socialist organisation.
>
> Exactly. Yet it seems that according to SRD, homo***uality invalidates
tha=
t.
>
Whether a homo***ual practices, abstains, or pretends to conform has
no effect on my *****sment. So homo***uality doesn't invalidate the
right to participate in chosen ***ual activity.

The most extreme measure that could be contemplated is to exclude
homo***uals from the party. I don't advocate this. Consider that I
compared conspirativists to homo***ual activists. Yet, I'm not
inclined to exclude conspirativists. I certainly wouldn't want to see
vngelis excluded. But the leader****p should absolutely refuse to humor
him on his conspirativist delusions. (Or concede even a blink of
attention to homo***ual members who insist the party take up gay
rights.{

But consider, even if homo***uals were excluded, it still wouldn't
violate your principle. Exclusion wouldn't depend on conduct but
traits. (I don't say, for example, that occasional acts of
homo***uality necessarily indicate anything. More like they represent
a borderline personality disorder or traits rather than actual
homo***uality.) A strong additional argument against exclusion is it
would require applying a diagnosis.

srd