Re: HAARP: High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program

On 2008-05-19 01:52 +0100, stephen allegedly wrote:
> On May 18, 3:58 pm, dusty <trackdu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> But I was disgusted by your clear inference that Vngelis was mentally
>> sick - and that was my way of attempting to discredit such THEORY on
>> the matter that you expounded. You cannot deny that the horrific cycle
>> of treatments, all justified by reference to a body of theory much of
>> it still in practice today is on the record. I don't like the use of -
>> what I consider - a dubious science to provide an answer for
>> essentially political questions - particularly, but not exclusively,
>> when the victim is Vngelis.
> 
> I understand your reservation. It is the reason I delayed
> "psychologizing" this argument for as long as I did. What moved me to
> make the point was, first, that I had an insight, or what I consider
> such, into relation****p between conspirativism and the left on the one
> hand and homo***uality and the left on the other. Both conspirativism
> and homo***ual activism have had debilitating effects on left-wing
> politics, and it occurred to me that the reason is they are each
> associated with paranoia. 

We'll get back to that later.

> Second, what moved me, is that vngelis was
> calling the anti-conspirativists crazy. Not in the same way, granted.
> vngelis was not imputing a clinical syndrome. vngelis was alleging,
> instead, brainwa****ng by the new world order. But effectively, it's
> the same thing. At some point, intellectual honesty required saying
> that if I seemed crazy to vngelis, it was because vngelis is crazy.

Vngelis says Stephen is crazy. As a consequence, "intellectual honesty" 
requires Stephen to say: "No I'm not! You are!".

Spot on, Chris!


-- 
DF.
to reply privately, change the top-level domain
in the FROM address from "invalid" to "net"