On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:07:39 -0400, Sebastian Rector
<ciceroii@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>The McCain campaign is doomed to failure. Time for GOPigs to jump in
front
>of a train. This is the end of right wing politics in the USA!
get real. This is all part of the plan. They want the Democrats to
get stuck with a failed war and destroyed economy so there is someone
to blame besides themselves. The right wing will continue to do
everything they can to destroy the American middle class and expand
the oil wars and letting the Democrats take the blame. After four
years of a disastrous economy and failed conquest of the middle east
the Republicans will bring in a strong candidate, take control, and
the stage will be set for a manufactured crisis quickly followed by
the cor****atist police state they've been wanting so badly.
Hal
>
>Newsweek Poll: Obama Opens Up 15-Point Lead
>
>51 to 36
>
>
> Barack finally has his bounce. For weeks many political experts and
>pollsters have been wondering why the race between Democrat Barack Obama
and
>Republican John McCain had stayed so tight, even after the Illinois
senator
>wrested the nomination from Hillary Clinton. With numbers consistently
>showing rock-bottom approval ratings for President Bush and a large
majority
>of Americans unhappy with the country's direction, the opposing-party
>candidate should, in the normal course, have attracted more disaffected
>voters. Now it looks as if Obama is doing just that.
>
>
>And it's not just Obama that's bouncing, according to Newsweek, it's the
>Democratic Party in general:
>
>
> Obama's current lead also reflects the large party-identification
>advantage the Democrats now enjoy-55 percent of all voters call
themselves
>Democrats or say they lean toward the party while just 36 percent call
>themselves Republicans or lean that way.
>
>
>And about that fictitious problem with women? Well, he leads McCain by 21
>points in that demographic.
>
>
>Obviously, it's still waaay early in the game, but the article points out
>that Obama is "running much stronger" than either Al Gore or John Kerry
were
>at this point in the process.
>
>
>http://www.newsweek.com/id/142465?from=rss
|
