I sent the following message out widely earlier today. Neither
Conspiracy Files programme can be viewed any more from the BBC iPlayer
website, despite programs supposed to be available for a week after
broadcast (and the February 2007 programme being available yesterday).
Some people at the BBC are part of the conspiracy to cover up the
truth, it would seem...
Sunday's BBC TV programme, in the "Conspiracy Files" series, about the
third tower in New York that collapsed on 9/11, several hours after
the other two towers, can be viewed at
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00ck4jd
(but it may only be viewable within the UK and it is probably only
available for a week after broadcast). Some short trailers/excerpts
are available at YouTube (search for "Conspiracy Files" or go to
http://youtube.com/watch?v=BP_GyIV76-Q).
The programme provided a lot of strong evidence for a conspiracy:
* The third tower collapsed without a plane hitting it, supposedly due
to fire. On no other occasion in history has a building with steel
sup****t collapsed due to fire (unless you count the twin towers that
collapsed earlier that day with the planes hitting them starting fires
before they collapsed).
* The tower collapsed virtually at freefall speed, like the other two
towers, in seconds, like a controlled demolition.
* The collapse was so symmetrical that the steel sup****ts on different
sides of the building had to give way at precisely the same time. It
was very similar but much more symmetrical than examples of controlled
demolition shown in the programme, indicating that something more
advanced than conventional explosives was used.
* It appears that the steel melted to cause the collapse (red hot
metal was spotted in the wreckage hours after the collapse), and it
was suggested that an advanced explosive material called
"thermite" (or "nanothermite") was used. A thermite explosion was
demonstrated in a lab.
* The building contained offices for the CIA and other secret services
and government departments, and was probably where the conspiracy was
hatched so the collapse was to destroy evidence.
* A fire alarm test was taking place all day (incredible in any
building let alone one with such im****tant offices in it).
* Re****ter Barry Jennings ignored the fire alarm and investigated the
tower after it had been evacuated. He said he went into an emergency
response centre that was empty but had still hot coffee, heard
explosions within the building and stepped over bodies (despite the
official story that there was no loss of life in that building).
* It was re****ted on TV news programmes (including the BBC by Jane
Standley, a journalist in New York) that the tower had collapsed or
was collapsing, before it actually did so. Some people have criticised
Jane for being part of the conspiracy but it seems that she was just
fed that not yet up-to-date information.
* The live satellite link from the BBC in the UK to Jane Standley
broke down with the picture becoming pixilated (like with digital TV
when there is a bad signal) during the interview. The official
explanation was that a satellite subscription had expired and an
automatic timer kicked in - but I've never heard of that happening on
any other occasion and for it to happen then hardly seems to be a
coincidence!
* BBC tapes of news on 9/11 were lost, and eventually found on the
2002 shelf (rather than 2001). The programme said this showed it was
"a cock-up rather than a conspiracy", but it certainly could be part
of a massive conspiracy!
If you take one particular item from the above list, it may be
possible to concoct a fairly plausible story, and the programme did
give some official (but not particularly plausible) explanations, but
them all happening on the same day: a coincidence? Hardly!
The previous programme in the series about 9/11 (aired on February
2007, also viewable on the BBC website at
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00795mb)
was heavily criticised for being biased against the conspiracy
theorists. However, there was some very convincing evidence of a
conspiracy towards the start of that programme, with the second half
concentrating on views of the establishment (which viewers tended to
forget due to receiving a lot of complex information and a limited
amount of short term memory). The start of the programme (all in the
first fifteen minutes I think) included the following:
* There were a few separate and clearly viewable explosions in (at
least) one of the twin towers below the point at which it was
collapsing. This certainly confirms the controlled demolition theory.
* The US secret services had been planning for the possibility of a
plane being hijacked and flown into a tower before 9/11 (which
establishment figures including George W Bush lied about).
* Interceptor planes, that could have shot the hijacked aircraft down,
were (deliberately in my opinion) sent the wrong way.
Somebody on my "assassination-of-princess-diana" discussion group (at
Yahoo!) asked where I got my information on 9/11 from. I initially got
evidence from links provided by Mark Rabinowitz's website
http://www.oilempire.us.
I then got information from the first BBC do***entary, after which I
wrote my "9/11 Inside Job" song. I have also got information from
"Loose Change" videos at YouTube, last Friday's BBC ten o'clock news
and of course the second BBC do***entary.
When I checked Rabinowitz's website more recently I noticed that it
tended to promote some of the less convincing conspiracy ideas, and I
have just checked it again which appears to confirm my suspicion that
Rabinowitz is an agent of the establishment. He rubbishes "Loose
Change", saying that it contains a lot of false conspiracy theories
(which any film made by a group of people is bound to do so),
suggesting that the CIA were responsible for those videos. Whereas CIA/
FBI involvement in some of the conspiracy ideas would be expected, to
try to discredit the whole project, writer/director Dylan Avery came
across in the BBC programmes as extremely genuine.
If you search for "Loose Change" at YouTube, with quotes around it to
ensure consecutive words, you get an estimate of 2500 videos! Some are
obviously better than others; I was disappointed with a video of the
first part when I watched it in the spring of 2007, but the second
part seemed to contain evidence of the explosions (judging by the
commentary but I was doing other things on the computer at the time so
I couldn't be certain). I therefore checked out part 2 of the "Final
Cut" before sending my message on Sunday urging people to watch the
BBC programme that evening. The evidence of explosions towards the
start of that video wasn't as convincing as the BBC coverage (but
there was smoke coming from the bottom of the tower and several eye-
witnesses said they heard the sound of explosions/bombs.
There is censor****p at YouTube. Somebody once pointed out that
searches fail to find videos on some occasions than they find at
others. Also, the video listed first when you now search for "Loose
Change" (with over 1.4 million views) stopped both times I tried to
play it on my laptop a small amount in and caused the Internet
Explorer window on a computer in an internet cafe on which I played it
to close prematurely (at about or exactly the same point). It
therefore makes sense for those "Loose Change" video-makers who have
predominantly good intentions to help produce some less convincing
videos as well as the better ones, in order to ensure that the truth
gets out to a wide audience.
Rabinowitz fails to actually say what conspiracy theories he actually
agrees with, apart from giving an unremarkable connection to oil (and
"peak oil" in particular which he appears to have an obsession with).
He has a page on videos, but plugs ones you need to buy rather than
watch on the internet for free. Personally, I trust "Loose Change" and
the BBC far more than Rabinowitz.
I am also inclined to distrust Rabinowitz because he re****ted me to my
email provider (Yahoo!) after I sent him the lyrics of my "9/11 Inside
Job" song (after recording it as a musical poem and much more recently
recorded with my band Red Day) thanking him for his help in inspiring
me to write it! He had previously threatened to re****t me for sending
him "spam", and a CAPTCHA appeared when I next logged in to my email
account to check that I am not a computer program.
Rabinowitz did usefully point me towards a re****t in 2000 by the
Project for a New American Century (which includes vice-president Dick
Cheney among its members and then defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld
was a founder member) saying that "some catastrophic and catalyzing
event - like a new Pearl Harbor" would be needed as a pretext for
their plans for "United States global hegemony".
Rabinowitz's website also informed me about the Skull and Bones
Society (sometimes known as the Order of the Skull and Bones) - a very
secretive organisation based at Yale University including George W
Bush (and two past presidents including Bush's father) and John Kerry
as members! The society's Wikipedia page confirms that information.
Rabinowitz argued that the 2004 presidential election was between two
different wings of the Skull and Bones Society and therefore it didn't
matter who won. I emailed him arguing that this shows that that
conspiratorial organisation was in fact infiltrated by left-wing
conspirators and that Kerry was actually playing a good role. Kerry
pledged in a live TV debate with Bush to tax the rich (reversing 85 or
90 billion dollars of tax cuts Bush had granted to people earning over
$200,000 a year) and close all tax loopholes. Bush fraudulently won
that election, as pointed out on my "us-electoral-fraud" group (at
Yahoo!).
The trick of putting establishment propaganda towards the end of the
programme was also used in the episode in the "Conspiracy Files"
series on the death of Princess Diana, which I still believe was an
assassination despite the result of the inquest. The inquest was
highly flawed in only allowing conspiracy theories of Mohammed al-
Fayed (obviously because his son Dodi died in Paris) to be presented,
and much more convincing theories by investigators like David Cohen
(author of the brilliant book "Diana: Death of a Goddess") were not
heard.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/assassination-of-princess-diana/message/67
to read my views on Diana's assassination.
There are some factors common to 9/11 and Diana conspiracies in there
being a large number of people involved and a lot of complex planning
by conspiratorial organisations, which I believe is partly done in
people's minds and partly by computer programs. In any political
organisation (conspiratorial or open), members decide (democratically
or otherwise) on particular aims, and strategies and tactics in order
to try to achieve those aims. Members of the organisation tend to be
loyal to it and back up other members whether they have genuine or
ulterior motives, because to do otherwise would lead them to be
ostracised. Those who are tempted to leave such an organisation to
become a whistle-blower may be threatened (as Barry Jennings was
despite not being a conspirator) and indeed (with so much at stake)
bumped off.
I have actually implemented (and was the main designer of) an
artificial intelligence/simulation language called SDML (standing for
Strictly Declarative Modelling Language) on which complex modelling of
the world, analysing past events, predicting the future and deciding
what to do to achieve your desired outcomes, is possible. I am
currently working on improvements to it to speed up database
accessing, and will put a new version of it (as open source Smalltalk
code) soon at http://www.sdml.org.uk.
Such software could be used for
very bad purposes if used by certain organisations so I'll be careful
about publicising it - I've deliberately mentioned it at the end of
this very political message in order to reach the more socialist and
libertarian-inclined people who are likely to read it.
----- Original Message ----
From: Steve Wallis <revolutionarysocialiststeve@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Subject: BBC 9/11 "Conspiracy Files" pogramme tonight on demolition of
third tower
The BBC (British Broadcasting Cor****ation) 10 o'clock news on Friday
included an item on the third tower that collapsed in New York on
9/11, without being hit by a plane. There is a programe in the
"Conspiracy Files" series on BBC2 tonight (Sunday 6 July) at 9pm,
about 9/11 conpiracy theories focusing on the third tower.
That tower contained the CIA and FBI headquarters, and was obviously
demolished to remove evidence of a conspiracy. It collapsed several
hours after the other two (and apparently its collapse was re****ted on
in the news before the collapse actually happened) and nobody died (so
it was obviously evacuated). The BBC news item re****ted that finally
there is an official explanation - which didn't sound at all plausible
to me, but watch the "Conspiracy Files" programme and judge for
yourself...
All three towers collapsed in about ten seconds, in the same way as
buildings collapse when explosives are used. I urge those who doubt a
conspiracy (or those who want more evidence of one) to watch "Loose
Change" videos at YouTube. Part 2 (of a three part series) provides
the best evidence of explosives being used to bring the towers down.
Watch the Final Cut of part 2 at http://youtube.com/watch?v=yAS4TIYF68A
to see smoke rising from the bottom of one of the towers as it starts
to collapse and to hear many eye-witnesses re****ting exlosions/bombs
(near the begining of that clip). That clip has been rated (by 180
viewers) at a maximum five stars, so the evidence of a conspiracy
obviously convinces YouTube viewers.
The Project for a New American Century (of which Donald Rumsfeld and
Dick Cheney are members) argued for "a new Pearl Harbor", and lo and
behold, one took place. An earlier "Conspiracy Files" progamme on 9/11
pointed out that interceptor planes were sent in the wrong direction
to avoid stopping the civilian aircraft from cra****ng into the towers.
I was inspired by that programme to write a song called "9/11 Inside
Job", which my band Red Day recently did a recording of. You can read
the lyrics or download it from http://www.red-day.net/lyrics/911-3.html,
or go to my page on one of the social networking sites (MySpace/
Facebook/Bebo) in the signature below.
--
Steve Wallis (Glasgow, Scotland)
For im****tant/urgent communications, please email:
warcrysteve@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/steve-wallis-socialist-blog,
http://blog.myspace.com/galaxiasteve
My socialist website: http://www.socialiststeve.me.uk
My pages at MySpace: http://www.myspace.com/galaxiasteve,
Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=731729407
and Bebo:
http://www.bebo.com/SteveW519
Founder, Good Intentions Network: http://www.goodintentionsnetwork.org
Founder, Ethical Capitalism Network: http://www.ethicalcapitalism.net
Founder, Foundation for PR-based Socialism: http://www.PRsocialism.org
Founder, Revolutionary Platform Network:
http://www.revolutionaryplatform.net
My socialist band, Red Day: http://www.red-day.net
Author, "Revolution Destroyed? Have I ensured that a world socialist
revolution will never happen?": http://www.revolutiondestroyed.net
For discussion of the credit crunch, go to
http://www.revolutionaryplatform.net/forum/index.php?board=156
|
