Re: Socialism and Capitalism

On Jul 22, 8:47=A0am, Topaz <mars1...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:42:34 GMT, Alex Russell
>
> <alexander.russ...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >Hi Topaz,
>
> >you seem to be bent on out doing MP in the 'piece of crap' department.
> >This is counter productive as it give people reading this thread the
> >impression that you are avoiding MP's questions and can rally no reply
> >better than a personal attack.
>
> =A0I can't very well answer his questions if I don't read them.

  But you don't answer them when you do read them.  In fact you
often go to great lengths not answering them in the response to them.
For instance:

">  And what is the alternative?  That the people in Mexico and China
>not be allowed to compete with us?  What do they eat while they are
>forbidden this right?

   We should not go down to their level. Every nation should do the
best it can for it's people and not have capitalism. "

  Note that you do not answer any of the question I asked.  You simply
made assertions that do not address my questions.

> Here are my policies.
>
> 1. I do not read rude posts.
>
  You never gave a real response to any of my posts, regardless of
whether
they were rude or not.  And how could you know they were rude if you
didn't
read them?

> 2. I snip rude posts completely in my reply.
>
  Which is dishonest as it doesn't respond to any of the arguments in
the
post or allow people to judge your response fairly.

> 3. I don't give any personal reply to rude posts but only a cut and
> paste.

  When do you give anything but a cut and paste?  Occasionally you'll
throw in some non-sequiturs but those become c&ps after the first time
too.
>
> 4. I don't let rude posts get the last word.
>
  There is nothing ruder than simply ignoring an honest question,
which
you do all the time.
>
> >I would would much rather read your reasoned answers to MP's questions
> >as I am actually interested in learning other's point of view and not
> >just enjoying some right wing echo chamber.
>
> =A0Not possible. It violates rule #1 above.
>
  It is possible if you had an answer.

> But here is a cut and paste of a past arguement when he was more
> civilized for a while:

  And in which you made not a single point.
  Wow, you thought if you cut and pasted an entire post and put it in
a response to someone else I wouldn't notice and wouldn't respond to
it.
God you're a lowlife.  Well Alex here's my response to his post, which
destoyed him.
http://groups.google.com.au/group/talk.politics.libertarian/tree/browse_frm=
/thread/1033b0c9aec2d127/ba4f9ba282be1d41?hl=3Den&rnum=3D21&_done=3D%2Fgrou=
p%2Ftalk.politics.libertarian%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2F1033b0c9aec2d127%2Ffb=
16440737d73f32%3Fhl%3Den%26#doc_a9262b1b50522837