Re: Re: Socialism and Capitalism

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:03:21 -0700 (PDT), Michael Price
<nini_pad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:


>
>  But you don't answer them when you do read them.  In fact you
>often go to great lengths not answering them in the response to them.
>For instance:
>
>">  And what is the alternative?  That the people in Mexico and China
>>not be allowed to compete with us?  What do they eat while they are
>>forbidden this right?
>
>   We should not go down to their level. Every nation should do the
>best it can for it's people and not have capitalism. "
>
>  Note that you do not answer any of the question I asked.  You simply
>made assertions that do not address my questions.

  Free Trade would result in North America going down to the level of
Mexico. America should not allow products from Mexico in the country,
except for food or materials we may barter for because we don't have
them here. 

 Look in Walmart and see everything that came from Mexico. That's why
Americans don't have plenty of well paying jobs here. We should not
"compete" with Mexicans. Mexico should have their own social economics
and do the best for their own people. We should not go down to their
level.

>
>> Here are my policies.
>>
>> 1. I do not read rude posts.
>>
>  You never gave a real response to any of my posts, regardless of
>whether
>they were rude or not.  And how could you know they were rude if you
>didn't
>read them?

 The example above was just that my answer was over your head. And I
may stop reading a post at a certain point.

>
>> 2. I snip rude posts completely in my reply.
>>
>  Which is dishonest as it doesn't respond to any of the arguments in
>the
>post or allow people to judge your response fairly.


  Such persons deserve no respect at all.

>
>> 3. I don't give any personal reply to rude posts but only a cut and
>> paste.
>
>  When do you give anything but a cut and paste?  Occasionally you'll
>throw in some non-sequiturs but those become c&ps after the first time
>too.
>>
>> 4. I don't let rude posts get the last word.
>>
>  There is nothing ruder than simply ignoring an honest question,
>which
>you do all the time.

 I have never done that if the question was civil.


>>
>> >I would would much rather read your reasoned answers to MP's questions
>> >as I am actually interested in learning other's point of view and not
>> >just enjoying some right wing echo chamber.
>>
>>  Not possible. It violates rule #1 above.
>>
>  It is possible if you had an answer.
>
>> But here is a cut and paste of a past arguement when he was more
>> civilized for a while:
>
>  And in which you made not a single point.
>  Wow, you thought if you cut and pasted an entire post and put it in
>a response to someone else I wouldn't notice and wouldn't respond to
>it.
>God you're a lowlife.  

  Your getting smarter. Your putting your filthy insults at the end so
I at least read some of your post.

http://www.ihr.org/
     http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org
    http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html