Re: Re: Socialism and Capitalism

On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 01:39:58 -0700 (PDT), tk9830@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

>ok my point of view (somehow randomless). Capitalism would be a good
>system if the world had been in sandbox mode. You know endless
>resources, zero disposal and good willing nature of everyone
>(literally everyone).  I believe we all understand that if all the
>countries in the world adopt the "ac***ulation of capital and wealth
>paradigm"  this planet would come to an end at least for the humans
>(long live roaches). So there are two options: either we leave the
>number of capitalists countries constant or we all change to a
>different economic system that can sup****t all of us.

 No National Socialism is the answer. Socialism should only be for our
nation. If people want to donate to Africa that is fine, but tax money
should not go there. A worldwide system overlooks the fact that Whites
are on average much more intelligent than Blacks. It's not like there
are only a few Blacks in Africa. Putting all of Africa on welfare is
madness. 


> Of course
>capitalism is far more better than communism in the ways of production
>since in capitalism production methods are intensive (we use something
>until is completely dilapitated; even humans) and in communism
>extensive (we use as many as possible resources). That means if
>communism was the winner, today we wouldn't exist (figure of speech).
>As for these metaphysics mumbo jumbo that people born greedy or
>selfish.... come on... people become what their environment is. And
>before you object, i'm telling you that it takes more than one
>generation for things to change. So even if we change our habits we
>will not be alive to see how things will go (well i have a cryogenic
>unit at home i hope it'll work). And yes Socialism is the answer but
>with a twist of individuality. Let's call it liberal Socialism.

http://www.ihr.org/
     http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org
    http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html