Re: Socialism and Capitalism

On Jul 26, 8:17=A0am, Topaz <mars1...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:35:50 -0700 (PDT), Michael Price
>
> <nini_...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > =A0If the races are not equal then why do you need to guarantee whites
> >jobs, income and elimination of competition from "inferior" races?
>
> =A0Affirmative action is what the liberals want.

  Then you're a liberal since it's what you want.  In any case you
haven't
answered my question.  If whites are superior then why not simply
let them compete on the open market?

> But capitalism is also bad. The idea that people need to compete to
> see who will work for the fewest pennies per hour is wrong.

  Well for a start why is the idea that we should compete to see who
will work for the smallest pennies wrong?  Why shouldn't I pick the
guy who'll fix my roof for $50 rather than the one who charges $2000?
  And (as I've said before to your exact same words, that's not what
capitalism is.
>
> > Oh  wait, I get it, the races aren't equal because Jews are superior
an=
d
> >must be eliminated or crippled (economically, educationally and
> >politically) if us poor stupid whites are to succeed!
>
> =A0Jews are a race of enemy parasites. We should have a nation without
> them, and we will be fine without them.

  if Jews are parasites then why was it neccesary to prevent them
competing in productive endevours?  Surely parasites don't need to
be banned from productive trades since they never enter them.
  In fact you think of Jews as so superior that they must be limited
and if neccesary elminated to make sure that whites don't fall behind
them.