Re: Socialism and Capitalism

On Jul 27, 8:12=A0pm, Topaz <mars1...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 20:59:03 -0700 (PDT), Michael Price
>
> <nini_...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> =A0Affirmative action is what the liberals want.
>
> > =A0Then you're a liberal since it's what you want. =A0In any case you
> > haven't answered my question. =A0If whites are superior then why
> > not simply let them compete on the open market?
>
> =A0Whites are more intelligent and invent many things.

  But note that they only invent them in cir***stances where everyone
else does.  Note also that Jews "punch above their weight" in terms of
inventions and research.

> But Mexicans are superior at working for the least pennies per hour.

  Only because they're generally poor.

> Capitalism should be flushed from our society along with the idea
> of competing for jobs.
>
  So people should just hire you despite there being a better
person to do the job?
>
> > =A0Well for a start why is the idea that we should compete to see who
> >will work for the smallest pennies wrong?
>
> =A0 It results in the few very rich and the many very poor.
>
  Well no, it results in riches going to those that produce good work
worth paying more for.  The idea that the super-rich has been

> > =A0Why shouldn't I pick the guy who'll fix my roof for $50 rather than
> >  the one who charges $2000?
> >
> > =A0And (as I've said before to your exact same words, that's not what
> >  capitalism is.
>
> =A0For one thing America has not only a minimum wage but also safety
> laws among other laws. Mexicans don't have such things yet they want
> their products to compete with American products.

  So what?  The fact that someone wasn't safe enough (by your
standards
not his) doesn't make his competitors product

> We should not allow their products in the country. It's much better to
> have plenty of good paying jobs in the country.
>
 And what is a good paying good but one where you can afford a lot of
things?  And you can afford a lot of things if you get to buy from as
many
competitors as possible.
>
> > =A0if Jews are parasites then why was it neccesary to prevent them
> > competing in productive endevours? =A0Surely parasites don't need to
> > be banned from productive trades since they never enter them.
> > =A0In fact you think of Jews as so superior that they must be limited
> > and if neccesary elminated to make sure that whites don't fall behind
> > them.
>
> =A0Jews control the media and rule America.

  That may be so but they do compete in productive endevours, from
entertainment to medicine, very well.  If they're all parasites why
would
they be able to do this?

> That is why America is
> always involved in the Middle East. Jews are behind both Capitalism
> and Communism. Here is a quote from Mein Kampf:
>
  Which does not address the point.  Assertions by professional liars
are not evidence.