"Bishop" <The Bishop@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:IwmQe.51316$2Q3.8550@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> You and I discussed this a while back. I went
> to your site, but I must say, it was a bit
> confusing as to exactly what was going on there.
I remember you, but not discussing me. The web site is not well
organised. Try http://www.sarahbranson.com/
because you will find an
example of a High Court Judge Mr Justice Tugendhat lying.
http://www.sarahbranson.com/harassment/aug04/order01.htm
accuses me:
"2. The Respondent continued to publish on websites, the domain name of
which are registered to him or over which he has control, and the
Respondent has not removed, statements which assert or suggests that the
Applicant has conducted an affair or have or have had a ***ual
relation****p with the second Claimant," after 24 February 2005.
Search any archive you care. You'll not find it. We are dealing with
published material here, not recollections. If it existed, the do***ent
could be produced. It cannot. High Court Judge Mr Justice Tugendhat was
lying.
Anyway, the answer to what is happening to me, is I am denied access to
all services. They will not even let me work.
> So capitalistic gurus have reign there too.
Combined with the twin British virtues of humbug and hypocrisy.
--
T Moore
N E Manchester, England
http://sitemenu.tom-moore.com/
|
