On 28-Aug-2005, "T Moore" < click.an.email.ico@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > You and I discussed this a while back. I went
> > to your site, but I must say, it was a bit
> > confusing as to exactly what was going on there.
>
> I remember you, but not discussing me. The web site is not well
> organised. Try http://www.sarahbranson.com/
because you will find an
> example of a High Court Judge Mr Justice Tugendhat lying.
>
> http://www.sarahbranson.com/harassment/aug04/order01.htm
accuses me:
>
> "2. The Respondent continued to publish on websites, the domain name of
> which are registered to him or over which he has control, and the
> Respondent has not removed, statements which assert or suggests that the
> Applicant has conducted an affair or have or have had a ***ual
> relation****p with the second Claimant," after 24 February 2005.
>
> Search any archive you care. You'll not find it. We are dealing with
> published material here, not recollections. If it existed, the do***ent
> could be produced. It cannot. High Court Judge Mr Justice Tugendhat
was
> lying.
>
> Anyway, the answer to what is happening to me, is I am denied access to
> all services. They will not even let me work.
>
> > So capitalistic gurus have reign there too.
>
> Combined with the twin British virtues of humbug and hypocrisy.
It sure reads like a big mess. Not sure I understand what it is all
about...
threats and all that...
|
