Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > At the voting booth turn Left > Hiro****ma v Ne...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 7 Topic 217 of 263
Post > Topic >>

Hiro****ma v New Orleans

by "T Moore" < click.an.email.ico@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sep 3, 2005 at 06:53 AM

Man's status as an unwelcome guest on Planet Earth received further 
confirmation this past week, as hurricane Katrina cut a swathe of death 
and destruction across the southern United States.

No matter how big the bombs we build and however mighty the missiles we 
manufacture, when it comes to dealing mega-death Mother Nature - also 
called God - has us all licked.

Rank amateurs we are, depending on big machines and endless quantities of 
high explosive to achieve our destructive aim; whereas it takes nature a 
mere minute's tremble to raze cities to the ground or a thirty foot wave 
travelling across an ocean to kill hundreds of thousands.

The idea that, in addition to all the built-in violence that Earth can 
throw at us - earthquakes, floods, volcanic eruptions, tropical storms, 
disease - we feel impelled to add a bit of our own is amazing. With such 
an array of possibilities for horrible, premature death readily 
available, why add more?

Also amazing is that Katrina was allowed to do what she did in the first 
place. Hurricanes are a regular feature in that part of the world and 
you'd expect that the richest, most technologically advanced nation in 
the world could have done a bit more than cry "holy ****" and leg it for 
the hills.

I've hardly recovered from the stunning sight of an astronaut repairing a 
shuttle in space and now I'm confronted with the spectacle of obviously 
substandard housing lying there, ripped to pieces like shoeboxes, old 
cars floating down the streets, shops being looted and upwards of a 
thousand people lying dead, creating a serious risk of pestilence.

I'm reminded of an earthquake that hit Japan just the other day; a quake 
that caused minimal damage, in spite of its force. That's because the 
Japanese have learned to build for earthquakes. What has kept the 
Americans from constructing, in hurricane-prone areas, buildings that can 
withstand the likes of Katrina?

The Dutch, after their terrifying experience of the February 1953 storms, 
made sure that flooding and destruction on that scale would never happen 
again by creating the greatest storm surge barrier in the world.  They 
called it the Delta project.

You'd think that it wouldn't be beyond the wit of the US authorities to 
do something similar, but looking at the aerial photographs of southern 
Mississippi and Louisiana you'd think you were gazing down on Nicaragua 
or Honduras. A professor at Delft Polytechnic put it this way, "reducing 
the threat [of hurricanes] should be quite feasible technically. It's 
simply a matter of investing money."

Since when, in the world's largest economy, was money a problem?

There must be a reason for all this. The population of the stricken 
region is largely poor and mainly black. Not the kind of people on whose 
protection you'd spend a lot of money and effort, especially when that 
money and effort can be spent more profitably elsewhere, as in Iraq.

New Orleans may be one of the great attractions of the Deep South, 
especially on calm summer days as the black jazz bands can be heard in 
every club in Basin Street and the Mardi Gras parades move rhythmically 
down Bourbon Street, but its denizens are expendable.

Don't be surprised if the current problems stir up a racial resentment 
that many had thought was a thing of the past. And as for money: cleaning 
up the mess, restoring the infrastructure, rebuilding what has been 
destroyed is going to cost America huge amounts of dollars over a very 
long time. Adequate protection would have been a lot cheaper.

Meanwhile, the great and good are falling over themselves to express 
their horror at the scope of a disaster they did nothing to prevent. 
"Possibly the greatest natural disaster in our nation's history", the 
always impeccably briefed George W. Bush called it.  George W. Bush, you 
will recall, spent the start of the New Orleans disaster, at a fund 
raising even for the US Republican Party.

Louisiana State Governor Kathleen Blanco called the situation 
'untenable' and 'heartbreaking' and went on advising people to spend last 
Wednesday in prayer. "That would be the best thing to calm our spirits 
and thank our Lord that we are survivors", she said with that arcane 
logic that comes with deep religious faith, "slowly, gradually, we will 
recover; we will survive; we will rebuild."

No kidding. How loud a chord her words struck with those still trapped in 
their homes, or huddled together in the Superdome, or raiding the shelves 
of shops on Canal Street, or wading through the flooded streets looking 
for loved ones is hard to say.

I know it's probably unfair to criticize people for saying pointless 
things in times of crisis, but who wants to be fair? However much I 
sympathize with the dead, wounded, homeless and destitute of the southern 
US seaboard, worse has happened in the world. Mayor A Holloway of Biloxi, 
Mississippi, commented, "this is our tsunami."

No it isn't. It may be bad, certainly by American standards, but a 
tsunami it isn't.

But even that ill-considered claim seems innocuous when compared with the 
words of Mississippi State Governor Haley Barbour, after a quick fly-over 
of the inundated region, "it's not a case of homes being  severely 
damaged", he said, "they're just not there. I can only imagine that this 
is what Hiro****ma looked like 60 years ago."

Hiro****ma, eh? Isn't that the Japanese city that was incinerated by a 
nuclear bomb in the space of a few seconds, with 120,000 people being 
charred to a frazzle and many more dying of the effects of radiation in 
the following years? Strange to think that, from only a few thousand feet 
up, you can't tell the difference.


-- 
T Moore
N E Manchester, England

http://sitemenu.tom-moore.com/
 




 7 Posts in Topic:
Hiroshima v New Orleans
"T Moore" <   2005-09-03 06:53:24 
Re: Hiroshima v New Orleans
"John #8" <#  2005-09-05 12:37:37 
To John (was Hiroshima v New Orleans)
"T Moore" <   2005-09-05 15:08:11 
What is truth?
"Roger" <rog  2005-09-05 20:12:09 
Re: What is truth?
"T Moore" <   2005-09-06 05:00:51 
Re: Hiroshima v New Orleans
"John #8" <#  2005-09-05 12:57:05 
Re: Hiroshima v New Orleans
"T Moore" <   2005-09-05 15:49:19 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 5 22:52:38 CDT 2008.