On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:56:29 +0200, "Impeach Bush" <Go To Party
Party House Victorville
Party ,,, House
ALL GENDERS
(different nights 4 each
gender)
CALL...
JR 760-780-8743
Linda 909-282-6780
http://mysite.verizon.net/resogvzb/jr-linda/index.html
,,,,,,,larabraveheart@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Petition: Impeach President G.W. Bush
>
>http://www.petitiononline.com/TARGBush/petition.html
>
>
>
>To: Hon. Congresswoman Ms. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Speaker of the House
>
>We the undersigned - concerned citizens of foreign governments in sup****t
of
>citizens of the United States, and citizens of the United States -- come
>together to request that the governing bodies of the United States
Congress
>and Senate take the necessary actions to implement and sup****t House
>Resolution (H. Res.) 1106: the Articles of Impeachment Against President
>George W. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary of State, Ms.
>Condoleeza-Rice, as introduced by Honorary Congresswoman Cynthia
McKinney's
>(D-GA), on 8 December 2006.
>
>Our request is based on the following:
>
>
>
>
>. The Case for Impeachment, as described by Hon. Congresswoman Ms.
Cynthia
>McKinney in H. Res. 1106: in accordance with: (a) Article I. Failure to
>Preserve, Protect and Defend the Constitution, the conduct of which
includes
>Manipulating Intelligence and Lying to Justify War; (b) Article II: Abuse
of
>Office and of Executive Privilege, the conduct of which includes: Failure
to
>Uphold Accountability; and (c) Article III: Failure to Ensure the Laws
are
>Faithfully Executed, the conduct of which includes Illegal Domestic
Spying.
>
>
>. The Case for Impeachment, as described by Hon. Congresswoman Ms.
Cynthia
>McKinney in her Extension of Remarks on H. Res. 1106, entered into the
>Congressional Record on 27 December 2006 (pages E2253 - 2255); described
as
>"further actions by the President that warrant further investigation as
>possible grounds for impeachment as identified by many scholars, lawyers
and
>concerned citizens," such as: [I] Failure to Ensure The Laws are
Faithfully
>Executed: (1) Self-Exemption From Laws Upon Signing; (2) Suspension of
Basic
>Legal Proceedings; (3) Promoting Illegal War; (4) Promoting Torture; (5)
>Promoting Kidnappings and Renditions for Torture; (6) Use of Illegal
>Weapons; [II] Abuse of Office and of Executive Privilege: (1) Obstructing
>Inquiry and Detection; (2) Replacing the Veto With Signing Statements;
[III]
>Failure to Preserve, Protect and Defend the Constitution: (1) Suspension
of
>Due Process; (2) Unreasonable Searches and Seizures; (3) Non-Cooperation
>With Congress; (4) Establishment of an Unconstitutional, Parallel Legal
>System.
>
>
>. H. Res. 635, originally sponsored by Hon. Congressman R. Conyers (MI),
to
>create "a select committee to investigate the Administration's intent to
go
>to war before Congressional authorisation, manipulation of pre-war
>intelligence, encouraging and countenancing torture, retaliation against
>critics, and to make recommendations regarding grounds for possible
>impeachment," is as of 18 January 2006, co-sponsored by 38
representatives,
>those being: -- Rep. N. Abercrombie (HI); -- Rep. T. Baldwin (WI); --
Rep.
>L. Capps (CA); -- Rep. M. Capuano (MA); -- Rep. W. Clay (MO); -- Rep. D.
>Davis (IL); -- Rep. S. Farr (CA); -- Rep. C. Fattah (PA); -- Rep. B.
Filner
>(CA); -- Rep. M. Hinchey (NY); -- Rep. M. Honda (CA); -- Rep. J. Jackson,
Jr
>(IL); -- Rep. S. Jackson-Lee (TX); -- Rep. B. Lee (CA); -- Rep. J. Lewis
>(GA); -- Rep. C. Maloney (NY); -- Rep. B. McCollum (MN); -- Rep. J.
>McDermott (WA); -- Rep. C. McKinney (GA); -- Rep. G. Moore (WI); -- Rep.
J.
>Nadler (NY); -- Rep. J. Oberstar (MN); -- Rep. J. Olver (MA); -- Rep.
Major.
>R. Owens (NY); -- Rep. D. Payne (NJ); -- Rep. C. Rangel (NY); -- Rep. S.
>Rothman (NJ); -- Rep. M. Sabo (MN); -- Rep. B. Sanders (VT); -- Rep. J.
>Schakowsky (IL); -- Rep. H. Solis (CA); -- Rep. F. Stark (CA); -- Rep. J.
>Tierney (MA); -- Rep. N. Velazquez (NY); -- Rep. M. Waters (CA); -- Rep.
D.
>Watson (CA); -- Rep. L. Woolsey (CA); and -- Rep. D. Wu (OR).
>
>
>. As of January 18, 2006, the following Party resolutions sup****ting
>Impeachment have been passed by: (1) The California Democratic Party; (2)
>Democrats Abroad France; (3) Green Party of the United States; (4) Nevada
>Democratic Party; (5) New Mexico Democratic Party; (6) North Carolina
>Democratic Party Executive Committee; (7) North Carolina Democratic
Party;
>(8) Wisconsin Democratic Party; (9) NH Democratic Party; (10) Vermont
>Democratic Party; (11) Maine Democratic Party State Convention; (12)
Hawaii
>Democratic Party; (13) Colorado Democratic Party; (14) Alaska Democratic
>Party; (15) Oregon Democratic Party; and (16) California Green Party.
>
>
>. As of January 18, 2006, the following City/Town Council Resolutions
have
>been passed sup****ting Impeachment: (1) Santa Cruz (CA) (Rumsfeld); (2)
>Santa Cruz (CA) (Bush); (3) Arcata (CA) City Council; (4) San Francisco
(CA)
>City Council; (5) Brookfield (VT) Town Hall (Five Towns); (6) Dummerston
>(VT) Town Hall; (7) Marlboro (VT) Town Hall (Five Towns); (8) Putney (VT)
>Town Hall (Five Towns); (9) Newfane (VT) Town Hall; (10) Brattleboro (VT)
>Town Hall; (11) Rockingham (VT) Town Hall; (12) Plattsburg (NY) City
>Council; (13) Nederland (CO) Board of Trustees; (14) Woodstock (NY) Town
>Board (in sup****t of investigation); (15) Berkeley (CA) City Council (16)
>Lake Station (IN) City Council; (17) Carrboro (NC); (18) Chapel Hill
(NC);
>(19) Hanover (NY) Town Meeting; (20) Sebastopol (CA); (21) Brookline
(MA);
>(22) Fairfax (CA); (23) New Paltz (NY); (24) Santa Barbara (CA); (25)
>Amherst (MA); (26) Olympia (WA); (27) Wendell (MA).
>
>
>. In the elections of November 7, 2006, the following cities had
resolutions
>for impeachment on the ballot, which were voted on and passed in: (1)
>Berkeley, CA; (2) Champaign, IL; (3) Urbana, IL; (4) San Francisco, CA;
(5)
>Montpelier, VT.
>
>
>. As of 18 January 2007, the following State legislatures have drafted
>and/or introduced resolutions for the Impeachment of President George W.
>Bush: (1) Illinois (04/21/2006); (2) California (04/26/2006); (3) Vermont
>(04/26/2006); (4) Minnesota (05/04/2006); and (5) New Jersey (drafted,
not
>yet introduced).
>
>
>. 51% of all U.S. voters consider impeachment a priority, accordingly the
>New Democratic Congress, of whom you are the House Speaker, has a 51%
>Mandate to Impeach President Bush: (a) Democrats.com, a "Newsweek Poll
Shows
>New Democratic Congress will Have a 51% Mandate to Impeach Bush", (b)
MSNBC's
>Olbermann (on YouTube), a Newsweek poll found 51% of all U.S. voters
>considered impeachment a priority.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>The Undersigned
>
>The Impeach President G. W. Bush Petition to Hon. Congresswoman Ms. Nancy
>Pelosi (D-CA), Speaker of the House was created by PeakOil_RSA; 9/11
>Truth_RSA and written by Lara Johnstone
>
>
>
>Petition: Impeach President G.W. Bush
>
>http://www.petitiononline.com/TARGBush/petition.html
>
|
