Re: The George W Bush Presidency - The Republican's Finest Hour

In article <481da1f7$0$4103$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, CB@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> "Hothead McCain" <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:MPG.2286b6bd810f8f6498a201@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > In article <481cfec4$0$20178$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
CB@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
> > says...
> >>
> 
> >>
> >> Those two victories were just the start. President Bush passed tax
reform
> >> which created the lowest unimployment in history! He got the
prescription
> >
> 
> http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_comment/carter200402260852.asp
> 
> ...
> Nine months prior to the 1996 presidential election, Bill Clinton's
Council 
> of Economic Advisers cheerfully re****ted that the "American economy has 
> performed exceptionally well over the past 3 years." While that may not 
> surprise you, you may however be surprised to learn that President
George W. 
> Bush's economic record is, in many ways, better than the record Clinton
ran 
> on for reelection.
> 
> Compared with the "exceptional" years of 1993, 1994, and 1995, the first

> three years of George W. Bush's presidency featured:
> 
> 
>    lower inflation
>    lower unemployment
>    faster productivity growth
>    faster labor compensation growth (i.e., wages and benefits)
>    29.4 percent ($6.9 trillion) more economic output
>    45 percent ($960 billion) more ex****ts; and
>    an economic growth rate 81.2 percent as fast as that under Clinton
> 
>   See graph 
> 
> 
> begin 666 bullet_10x16.gif
> M1TE&.#EA$ `*`*(``/___ZZNKB @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
( ```/X!`@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"'Y! 04`/\`
> K+ `````0``H```,="+K<_BZ((0)486AMX=S4!6[7MPE7!G:01+%7O"0`.P``
> `
> end
> 
> 
Those are the three least relevant years by which to gage a
president's policy effect. Your statistics are probably lies
anyway, why don't you just list your source?