Re: -Students Shot at University as Landmark Second Amendment Case Unfolds

"Peter Franks" <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:QMkuj.985$yk5.253@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Dennis Kemmerer wrote:
>> "Peter Franks" <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:vx2uj.3003$f8.1288@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Dennis Kemmerer wrote:
>>>> "Peter Franks" <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>> news:9NNtj.887$QC.645@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> AirRaid wrote:
>>>>>> http://www.infowars.com/?p=246
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Students Shot at University as Landmark Second Amendment Case
Unfolds
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Shouldn't this read:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Students, deprived of the right to self-defense, murdered at
>>>>> University as Landmark Second Amendment Case Unfolds"
>>>>
>>>> Let me guess. You want students to be allowed to carry guns to class.
>>>
>>> Where did I indicate 'what I want'?
>>>
>>> Rather than trying to mire up the discussion with your assumptions on
>>> subjectivity, how about engaging subjectively?
>>
>> It was just a guess, and I'm guessing an accurate one, but I'll give
you
>> the benefit of the doubt.
>
> Were students able to exercise self defense?  If so, how/what?
>
> If they were not able to exercise self-defense, how did the school
> adequately provide suitable security?

You're not answering the question. You asserted that the students were 
'deprived of the right to self-defense.' You can either substantiate your 
assertion or simply say that it's your opinion.