Dennis Kemmerer wrote:
> "Peter Franks" <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:hIluj.1012$QC.623@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Dennis Kemmerer wrote:
>>> "Peter Franks" <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:QMkuj.985$yk5.253@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Dennis Kemmerer wrote:
>>>>> "Peter Franks" <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>> news:vx2uj.3003$f8.1288@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> Dennis Kemmerer wrote:
>>>>>>> "Peter Franks" <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:9NNtj.887$QC.645@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>> AirRaid wrote:
>>>>>>>>> http://www.infowars.com/?p=246
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Students Shot at University as Landmark Second Amendment Case
>>>>>>>>> Unfolds
>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Shouldn't this read:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Students, deprived of the right to self-defense, murdered at
>>>>>>>> University as Landmark Second Amendment Case Unfolds"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let me guess. You want students to be allowed to carry guns to
>>>>>>> class.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Where did I indicate 'what I want'?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rather than trying to mire up the discussion with your assumptions
on
>>>>>> subjectivity, how about engaging subjectively?
>>>>>
>>>>> It was just a guess, and I'm guessing an accurate one, but I'll give
>>>>> you
>>>>> the benefit of the doubt.
>>>>
>>>> Were students able to exercise self defense? If so, how/what?
>>>>
>>>> If they were not able to exercise self-defense, how did the school
>>>> adequately provide suitable security?
>>>
>>> You're not answering the question. You asserted that the students were
>>> 'deprived of the right to self-defense.' You can either substantiate
>>> your
>>> assertion or simply say that it's your opinion.
>>
>> Re-read my post, I made no assertion.
>
> I quoted you directly.
I made no assertion.
>> Nevertheless:
>>
>> 3-1.5a Possession, use, sale, or distribution in any residence hall,
>> building, or grounds under university control of: fireworks, firearms,
>> shotguns, rifles, hand guns, switchblade knives, any type of
ammunition,
>> explosives, and all other serious weapons
>>
>> Northern Illinois University
>> The Student Code of Conduct
>>
>> http://www.niu.edu/judicial/24430jo(body).pdf
>
> So are you arguing that section 3-1.5a of the NIU Student Code of
Conduct
> should be overturned?
No, I'm not making any argument.
> My eighth grade debate coach would've already flunked you.
Fantastic and irrelevant.
Have a nice day. Come back when you have something of substance to
discuss.
|
