"Peter Franks" <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:skpuj.5985$097.3776@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Dennis Kemmerer wrote:
>> "Peter Franks" <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:hIluj.1012$QC.623@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Dennis Kemmerer wrote:
>>>> "Peter Franks" <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>> news:QMkuj.985$yk5.253@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> Dennis Kemmerer wrote:
>>>>>> "Peter Franks" <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:vx2uj.3003$f8.1288@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> Dennis Kemmerer wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Peter Franks" <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:9NNtj.887$QC.645@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>> AirRaid wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.infowars.com/?p=246
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Students Shot at University as Landmark Second Amendment Case
>>>>>>>>>> Unfolds
>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Shouldn't this read:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Students, deprived of the right to self-defense, murdered at
>>>>>>>>> University as Landmark Second Amendment Case Unfolds"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Let me guess. You want students to be allowed to carry guns to
>>>>>>>> class.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Where did I indicate 'what I want'?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rather than trying to mire up the discussion with your assumptions
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>> subjectivity, how about engaging subjectively?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It was just a guess, and I'm guessing an accurate one, but I'll
give
>>>>>> you
>>>>>> the benefit of the doubt.
>>>>>
>>>>> Were students able to exercise self defense? If so, how/what?
>>>>>
>>>>> If they were not able to exercise self-defense, how did the school
>>>>> adequately provide suitable security?
>>>>
>>>> You're not answering the question. You asserted that the students
were
>>>> 'deprived of the right to self-defense.' You can either substantiate
>>>> your
>>>> assertion or simply say that it's your opinion.
>>>
>>> Re-read my post, I made no assertion.
>>
>> I quoted you directly.
>
> I made no assertion.
>
>>> Nevertheless:
>>>
>>> 3-1.5a Possession, use, sale, or distribution in any residence hall,
>>> building, or grounds under university control of: fireworks, firearms,
>>> shotguns, rifles, hand guns, switchblade knives, any type of
ammunition,
>>> explosives, and all other serious weapons
>>>
>>> Northern Illinois University
>>> The Student Code of Conduct
>>>
>>> http://www.niu.edu/judicial/24430jo(body).pdf
>>
>> So are you arguing that section 3-1.5a of the NIU Student Code of
Conduct
>> should be overturned?
>
> No, I'm not making any argument.
So it's just a bunch of hot air.
>> My eighth grade debate coach would've already flunked you.
>
> Fantastic and irrelevant.
>
> Have a nice day. Come back when you have something of substance to
> discuss.
Go play in my killfile.
[plonk]
|
