The Afgans offered Osama's head on a plattter three times (they knew his
location and offered to capture and turn over to US) but Bill refused it
each time. Perhaps he was distracted.
"ZeD" <zed@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:e8vhs3pfhrj3oc8jc0vvcpc2pvhi39g5a8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:46:05 -0800 (PST), Bill Crapkin
> <wcrapkin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>>On Feb 29, 4:29 pm, Max Quad <maxq...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> Clay Northwood <Northw...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> > George Bush has kept American free from Islamic terrorist attacks on
>>> > U.S.
>>> > soil since 9/11.
>>>
>>> And don't forget that he kept the US safe from Islamic terrorist
attacks
>>> before 9/11 as well during his reign! He's a ****ing hero!
>>>
>>> Oh! You forgot about the military grade Anthrax attacks that followed
>>> 9/11?
>>>
>>> Simple minds like yours forget history so easily. No wonder why you
>>> believe
>>> that others with more intelligence fall for your lies.
>>>
>>> It's too bad that Bush was asleep at the wheel in the months leading
up
>>> to
>>> 9/11, ignoring the warnings; and hasn't caught the guy who was behind
>>> it,
>>> unlike Clinton who did so when the WTC was first bombed. Then there's
>>> how
>>> Clinton caught right wing terrorist Tim McVeigh too! All without
pissing
>>> away hundreds-of-Billions on either.
>>
>>Too bad that Clinton in his many years of office made little to no
>>efforts to wage an aggressive campaign against Al-Queda after the 1993
>>WTC bombing and the attack on the USS Cole. Those attacks occured
>>under the Clinton regime. I will not say that a more aggresive
>>response would have prevented 9/11, but Clinton's inaction allowed
>>terrorist groups to grow and fester in Afghanistan and elsewhere
>>around the globe. You might not like Bush's approach to terrorism,
>>but suffice it to say Max you may wor****p your hero Clinton but when
>>it comes to fighting terrorism Clinton was no hero.
>
> I see so perhaps you can enlighten us as to which countries you think
> Clinton should have invaded and then occupied? Of course you must
> have some intelligence expertise to know such a thing so pray tell us
> oh bright bulb, what should he have done? Right, Clinton's inaction
> caused it all. When it comes to fighting terrorism, Bush baby is really
> great the way he got us bogged down in a country that had nothing to do
> with Al-Queda was truly inspirational. I would have rather the fool
> had done nothing than do what he's done to America. Baby Bush will go
> down as the all time worst president in American history. You probably
> want to blame Clinton for that too. Blaming Clinton is Bush sup****ters
> best defense of Bush baby. At least Bush daddy had a ****ing brain and
> didn't need Cheney to change his ****ing diapers daily.
|
