Re: The death of gun control - 2008

On Tue, 6 May 2008 13:53:14 -0500, "Herb Martin" <news@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>
>"Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>news:46b23ab7-3b91-4b01-8d1e-648f591f9ada@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>On May 6, 6:50 am, Chris Morton <cmor...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> In article <p6QTj.97542$TT4.96728@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Morton Davis says...
>
>> >> Record keeping isn't "Control".  I don't see anything in the
>> >> aforementioned statute restricting or controling the sale, only a
>> >> paperwork exercise.  Required at the Federal level as well.
>>
>> >Records of gun sales are supposed to be DESTROYED.
>>
>> They have "record keeping" in Chicago... the thing is, they won't let
you 
>> submit
>> any new "records", and it's a CRIME to not have a "recorded" handgun.
>>
>> Funny how that works, huh?
>>
>
><<   Has anyone ever wondered what would happen if a government were to
>require that voters be registered, and they did not let black people
>register to vote?
>>>
>
>Or how about a "license to Vote" requiring one to take a test, pay a fee,
>prove you aren't a felon?
>
>Taxing a vote?  Wouldn't that be a POLL TAX?
>
>Reading test for voting?
>
How about just proving you have some idea as to what the issues are
and why the guy/gal your about to pull the lever for is the right
choice.

i.e. You are making an "informed" decision.
-- 
"Before all else, be armed" -- Machiavelli