Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > The US Constitution > *** in public i...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 149 Topic 9989 of 10394
Post > Topic >>

*** in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone

by gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apr 30, 2008 at 11:31 AM

People who are against *** are ugly fat people who can't get laid, or
are people who have never been ****ed good.

*** in public should be legal.  It's the oldest act known to mankind,
and your unalienable right.


------------------

*** is not immoral if two forms of birth control are used, as the risk
of pregnancy falls to nearly zero.

It's the difference between a risk in the tens or hundreds and a risk
in the thousands or tens of thousands.

Combine any of the following two methods for greater protection
against pregnancy:

Condoms
Pill
Pull-Out Method
Diaphragm/Sponge

When used alone, some of these methods such as the pull-out method are
ineffectual.  When combined, the chance that both fail is nearly zero.

For example, if you roll one die, what is the chance 1 comes up?  1 in
6.  If you roll two dice, what is the chance you get s**** eyes? 1 in
36.  The risks of pregnancy are usually given on a yearly basis
assuming 80-100 *** acts.  If the risk of pregnancy in typical use is
1 in 6 for condoms and 1 in 12 for the pill, per year, this must mean
100 in 600 and 100  in 1200.   If you roll a 1200 sided die and a 600
sided die 100 times, what is the chance you get s**** eyes?  100 in
1200x600=720,000 or 1 in 7,200.   Thus the risk of pregnancy per year
in typical use if both condoms and the pill are used is 1 in 7,200,
compared to just 1 in 12 per year for the pill and 1 in 6 per year for
condoms.  In perfect use we see a similar difference of 1 in 50 for
condoms and 1 in 300 for the pill; this corresponds to 100 in 5,000
and 100 in 30,000.  The chance you get s**** eyes: 100 in
5,000x30,000=150,000,000 or 1 in 1,500,000 per year in perfect use
compared to 1 in 50 and 1 in 300.
 




 149 Posts in Topic:
Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-30 11:31:33 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-04-30 20:29:34 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-30 15:53:13 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-01 00:44:59 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone li
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-04 18:36:53 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
naturist <n8urst@[EMAI  2008-04-30 13:59:37 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-30 22:57:35 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-01 14:56:56 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother Jeffey Lo
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-04 18:40:49 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
ZerkonX <Z@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-01 13:19:23 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-01 15:04:09 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-02 15:20:54 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Anna <annaliddell@[EMA  2008-05-01 15:20:54 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-01 16:59:57 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Mark" <alln  2008-05-01 20:05:39 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-01 17:35:57 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-02 02:10:32 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-02 19:58:04 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-11 18:58:13 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-02 18:50:38 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-11 18:58:57 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-11 17:15:36 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-15 22:57:45 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-16 15:42:28 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-17 20:23:28 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-18 06:54:05 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-02 02:09:08 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-02 18:57:04 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-11 19:01:39 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-11 17:16:21 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 19:08:26 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Dan MacKay <cal1free@[  2008-05-01 18:20:28 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-01 19:24:00 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Zee <jonZeee@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-10 07:29:29 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 16:18:36 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 18:52:08 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-02 02:28:48 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-02 20:04:38 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-02 15:53:32 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-11 19:02:49 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Dan MacKay <cal1free@[  2008-05-01 23:24:44 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-02 20:10:04 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-02 18:52:24 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Zee <jonZeee@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-10 15:27:19 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 18:52:17 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-05-01 23:36:25 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Dan MacKay <cal1free@[  2008-05-02 13:29:09 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-03 00:00:59 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-02 18:58:49 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Zee <jonZeee@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-02 18:50:01 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Dan MacKay <cal1free@[  2008-05-02 20:56:01 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 22:36:12 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-03 10:31:13 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-04 09:53:59 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 22:36:23 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-04 00:18:39 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-04 09:52:40 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 22:36:54 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-05-02 23:05:09 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Dario Western"  2008-05-03 08:12:32 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-03 10:38:56 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-05-03 08:53:25 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-03 11:21:20 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-03 21:18:46 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 23:12:14 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-05-02 23:22:19 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-03 21:21:05 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 23:18:12 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-05-02 23:23:40 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Dario Western"  2008-05-03 08:12:32 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-03 10:44:58 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 23:47:59 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-05-03 08:34:17 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-04 00:12:04 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 23:51:31 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-05-03 08:35:44 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 23:56:49 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-11 19:10:11 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 23:56:58 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-03 23:46:58 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 23:57:05 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-04 09:46:35 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-08 02:28:03 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-06 23:46:13 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Richard C." &l  2008-05-07 11:10:14 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-07 21:32:35 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-06 23:46:20 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-06 23:46:32 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-07 18:35:16 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-06 23:46:41 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-06 23:46:49 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Zee <jonZeee@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-07 15:03:09 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-09 01:09:13 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-09 22:32:34 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 08:22:12 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 18:51:20 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-11 02:03:04 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 18:51:32 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 18:51:41 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 18:51:47 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-11 08:46:08 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 18:52:02 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-11 02:26:37 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 07:50:43 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 20:25:50 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 20:26:03 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-23 14:21:45 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-23 16:01:04 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Dan MacKay <cal1free@[  2008-05-23 14:24:32 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-23 14:51:55 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-26 13:08:53 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Zee <jonZeee@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-26 09:14:24 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 14:48:51 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 18:02:14 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-26 23:17:58 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-27 17:27:23 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-28 16:23:40 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 14:48:58 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 18:03:20 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 20:23:21 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 14:49:04 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 18:04:05 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-26 23:14:51 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Zee <jonZeee@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-26 15:01:56 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 17:20:40 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"David Looser"   2008-05-27 11:37:08 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-27 09:48:25 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-28 16:16:12 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 17:21:16 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 20:17:37 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 17:21:33 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 20:25:13 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 17:21:42 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 20:26:06 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 17:23:01 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 20:27:38 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-27 01:28:09 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 17:23:20 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 20:20:33 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-27 01:31:34 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Dan MacKay <cal1free@[  2008-05-26 19:13:04 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 23:11:28 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-06-06 21:17:57 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-06-06 21:18:05 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-06-18 11:46:09 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-06-18 15:02:29 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-06-18 11:48:26 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Zee <jonZeee@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-18 11:52:18 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Ron Hamilton <banmilk@  2008-06-18 11:51:19 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 13:53:40 CDT 2008.