Re: *** in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone

"Dan MacKay" <cal1free@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:150a2546-f632-4308-9e7e-90294b52b44d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 May 1, 7:24 pm, Peter Franks <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Dan MacKay wrote:
> > On May 1, 4:59 pm, Peter Franks <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> good...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> >>> *** is not immoral if two forms of birth control are used, as the
risk
> >>> of pregnancy falls to nearly zero.
> >> *** is immoral unless it is between a husband and wife, legally and
> >> lawfully married.
>
> > Where does it say that?
>
> > Come on, let's have solid quotes and references.
>
> Ex. 20: 14 Thou shalt not commit adultery.
>
> 1 Cor. 6: 9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the
> kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor
> adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind...



And which translation is that from??

You do realize that each of the different translations were altered to
sup****t the personal beliefs of the group doing the translation.
If the passage sounded "wrong" to them they just "re-translated" some
of the words.


<JS>
The part about the translation sup****ting specific beliefs is not entirely

true. It is certainly true in some instances, but the vast majority of 
translation errors are precisely that, translation errors.

*** outside of marriage is universally wrong, which explains why so many 
marriages end when one of the participants is found to be having ***
outside 
of the bond of marriage.

The trouble is with the definition of "universally," which you will
construe 
to mean each and every person that ever lived, then set about to show the 
exception.

</JS>