Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > The US Constitution > Re: The Religio...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 83 of 167 Topic 10045 of 10729
Post > Topic >>

Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homo***uality:

by Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED] May 11, 2008 at 07:43 AM

On Sun, 11 May 2008 02:16:36 GMT, "Jeff Strickland"
<crwlr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>Perhaps. But by the same token, your view that gayness happens by design
in 
>a world where the prime purpose of *** is childbearing,

That's a silly claim

The primary purpose of the *** drive is
pleasure---which results in procreation.

If childbearing was the intent of ***, it would
therefore be a choice and pleasure wouldn't be
associated with it.

whether or not procreation is the result of ***, in
humans--pleasure is the motivator---not children.
 




 167 Posts in Topic:
The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-09 05:02:11 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-09 13:24:28 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-09 15:21:40 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-09 16:07:36 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 08:16:04 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-13 04:46:05 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-13 07:13:26 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-14 03:54:24 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
SkyEyes <skyeyes9@[EMA  2008-05-09 16:02:08 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-09 16:44:12 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-10 00:53:50 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-09 18:16:51 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-10 01:22:25 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-09 18:41:57 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 08:11:23 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-10 14:30:06 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 16:14:39 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-10 17:18:57 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-12 07:31:02 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-12 07:30:11 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-14 22:34:07 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Bugman" <jm  2008-05-14 18:45:13 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-15 00:30:36 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
grayshockley@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-19 02:52:22 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-10 00:45:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-09 20:00:01 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-10 01:20:50 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-09 18:21:25 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-14 15:31:35 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-10 05:42:44 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-10 06:14:41 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-11 12:13:15 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-10 05:22:20 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-10 06:15:32 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 08:21:11 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-10 14:32:37 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-11 07:12:16 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-10 11:12:26 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-10 14:28:46 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"pbamvv@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-10 12:34:13 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-10 12:36:51 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"pbamvv@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-10 12:53:44 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-10 13:17:08 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
roneal@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 18:10:17 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-10 18:34:20 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-11 01:41:42 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-10 21:28:58 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 07:41:01 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-11 08:52:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-12 07:26:09 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-13 08:04:30 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-05-13 05:07:30 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-15 04:38:58 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-11 08:57:39 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-11 11:06:27 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-11 15:06:50 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-11 17:24:23 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 18:55:31 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-12 09:25:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-11 22:22:47 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-12 09:28:06 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-12 12:50:04 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-12 19:25:57 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-14 16:11:37 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-12 07:29:54 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 18:54:14 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-11 19:41:44 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-11 17:26:43 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-11 22:02:07 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-12 09:30:10 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-12 14:38:56 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 18:53:22 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-12 07:31:32 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-12 09:31:10 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-14 16:00:21 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-10 18:56:08 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-11 02:16:36 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-10 21:32:58 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-11 02:49:35 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-10 23:32:30 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-11 08:27:05 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-15 04:40:23 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 07:43:47 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-13 08:04:03 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-15 04:40:08 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-10 19:26:44 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-11 02:41:38 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-11 08:02:16 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 07:46:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-15 04:39:31 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-10 19:45:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Bob T." <bo  2008-05-10 20:17:43 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-11 16:38:58 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-11 19:40:00 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal MIS-Understanding of Homosexual
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 19:05:58 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-15 00:28:47 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-15 08:35:34 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-15 14:44:21 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Mark K. Bilbo"  2008-05-16 11:16:57 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-15 04:36:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-15 04:41:46 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"pbamvv@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-11 06:10:51 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
mizlee <mizlee@[EMAIL   2008-05-11 10:32:17 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-11 17:28:38 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 19:06:52 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-12 07:29:19 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Bob T." <bo  2008-05-11 19:29:24 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-12 09:51:52 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-12 19:24:49 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Jenny6833A <Jenny6833A  2008-05-12 10:36:27 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-13 01:00:17 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-12 21:51:08 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-12 21:44:31 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Jd <ZionsFire@[EMAIL P  2008-05-21 01:02:47 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-20 21:49:35 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-23 00:44:54 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-22 19:53:41 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-23 01:38:09 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-23 08:35:35 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-23 23:16:54 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-24 00:09:11 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-25 00:43:55 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-05-24 19:54:14 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-24 23:38:58 
Re: Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexual
Topaz <mars1933@[EMAIL  2008-05-25 11:43:48 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
cactus <cactus@[EMAIL   2008-05-28 08:20:14 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-23 15:33:39 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-23 23:16:55 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-24 00:10:23 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-25 00:43:56 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-24 23:45:30 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-22 21:43:44 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-23 23:16:57 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-24 00:15:14 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-24 07:35:25 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-25 00:43:58 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-25 08:22:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-25 00:43:57 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-24 23:46:32 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-23 08:33:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-23 23:16:58 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-24 00:19:48 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-25 00:43:59 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-24 23:52:08 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-28 00:10:44 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-27 23:48:36 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-30 01:04:00 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-29 22:16:29 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-30 23:57:03 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-30 21:09:21 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-05-31 02:34:27 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Bob LeChevalier <lojba  2008-05-31 03:54:34 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Mark K. Bilbo"  2008-05-31 11:42:00 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-06-01 01:24:12 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
"Mark K. Bilbo"  2008-06-01 10:32:51 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Zions Fire <ZionsFire@  2008-06-04 01:49:13 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
bushhelpscorporationsdest  2008-05-24 20:39:36 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-13 07:14:38 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-13 07:18:57 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-13 07:20:32 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-13 04:42:54 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-13 11:35:26 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
buckeye <buckeyeelo@[E  2008-05-13 15:04:09 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-14 07:16:58 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Josh Rosenbluth <jrose  2008-05-13 14:54:46 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-13 17:17:45 
Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homosexuality:
Pubkeybreaker <pubkeyb  2008-05-14 10:21:11 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Oct 11 20:49:13 CDT 2008.