Re: The Religious Rights' Unreal Understanding of Homo***uality:

buckeye wrote:
> Peter Franks <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> :|That immutable trait, as you call it, is contrary to nature.  This
can 
>> :|be proven scientifically:
>> :|
>> :|	Take a hetero***ual couple and place in an
>> :|	isolated yet life-sustaining environment.
>> :|
>> :|	Do the same with a homo***ual couple.
>> :|
>> :|	After a couple of generations of time,
>> :|	evaluate the results. Does nature sup****t
>> :|	human homo***uality?
>> :|
> 
> I'm glad you decided to branch out into more topics other than the
> Constitution topic.  In branching out you are truly showing all just how
> much a dunce you really are.  

Have a nice day.