Re: An oddity about the Neil Entwistle case - he didn't try to commit suicide

In message <ae4g64dn2sdptkcjs9vpnceo1cg1m1br6j@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Alex Heney 
<me8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes
>>>unstated place).  This seems damming forensic to me.  If she had shot
>>>herself, how did she clean the handle of the gun afterwards?
>>
>>
>>Those facts could easily be explained by someone coming upon the bodies
>>and picking up the gun. He might, for example, have cleaned the gun
>>because it was covered in blood. RH
>
>And any juror who thought that possibility raised any "reasonable 
>doubt" would need their head examining.
>
>Jury findings are not about asking whether there is any outlandish 
>possibility that could explain the facts without guilt.

Why outlandish? It would be a natural reaction to clean a gun if it had 
blood on it and one had picked it up. I can assure you far more unlikely 
scenarios have been put before juries. RH

>
>It is about whether there is any *reasonable* possibility that excludes 
>guilt.

-- 
Robert Henderson
Blair Scandal website: http://www.geocities.com/
blairscandal/
Personal website: http://www.anywhere.demon.co.uk