ray wrote:
> In article
> <3a7f375d-5297-4b8d-aada-e9ca2ea198e9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> carlos <carlosmachina@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> On May 15, 3:57 pm, Filthy Canadian
>> <MyQueenMumLove...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> > Man! Them dudes got it going don't they, eh!
>> >
>> > I always did have this thing about my 'lead' dog, Slope!
>> >
>> > It's a long way to travel, you know... all across the country...
>> > but it'll be worth it, eh!
>> > Yeah, it'll be worth it! When I pound ole' Slope then, it'll be
>> > legal!
>> >
>> > Oh... wait... does that mean I'll have to stay in CA?
>> > I'm not sure the frogs will take to me and ole' Slope in the same
>> > bed!
>> >
>> > Oh well, only one way to find out, eh!
>> >
>> > http://tinyurl.com/4aajn6
>> > --
>> >
>> > As always,
>> > I B your
>> > Filthy Stupid Socialist Frog Speaking Canadian
>> > It's All For The Dogs, Eh
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I really doubt you could find even a dog that would marry you
>> voluntarily. In California, both parties in the marriage have to
>> consent to be married.
>
> In a Republic, when people vote on something, the government is
> supposed to respect that vote; not let one person change the very law
> people wanted to enact.
In a constitutional Republic, when people pass a law and that law is in
direct conflict with the Constitution, the government is supposed to
repeal
the law. We are a nation of laws, not men. In that way, we avoid tyranny
of the majority.
|
