ray wrote:
> In article <g0kbvs$67c$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> ray wrote:
>> > In article
>> > <3a7f375d-5297-4b8d-aada-e9ca2ea198e9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> > carlos <carlosmachina@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On May 15, 3:57 pm, Filthy Canadian
>> >> <MyQueenMumLove...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> > Man! Them dudes got it going don't they, eh!
>> >> >
>> >> > I always did have this thing about my 'lead' dog, Slope!
>> >> >
>> >> > It's a long way to travel, you know... all across the country...
>> >> > but it'll be worth it, eh!
>> >> > Yeah, it'll be worth it! When I pound ole' Slope then, it'll be
>> >> > legal!
>> >> >
>> >> > Oh... wait... does that mean I'll have to stay in CA?
>> >> > I'm not sure the frogs will take to me and ole' Slope in the
>> >> > same bed!
>> >> >
>> >> > Oh well, only one way to find out, eh!
>> >> >
>> >> > http://tinyurl.com/4aajn6
>> >> > --
>> >> >
>> >> > As always,
>> >> > I B your
>> >> > Filthy Stupid Socialist Frog Speaking Canadian
>> >> > It's All For The Dogs, Eh
>> >>
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> I really doubt you could find even a dog that would marry you
>> >> voluntarily. In California, both parties in the marriage have
>> >> to consent to be married.
>> >
>> > In a Republic, when people vote on something, the government is
>> > supposed to respect that vote; not let one person change the very
>> > law people wanted to enact.
>>
>> In a constitutional Republic, when people pass a law and that law is
>> in direct conflict with the Constitution, the government is supposed
>> to repeal the law. We are a nation of laws, not men. In that way,
>> we avoid tyranny of the majority.
>
> That is IF it's in the Constitution. The Constitution does not cover
> marriage or who or what makes a legal marriage.
The Constitution does, however, cover equal protection and equal rights.
'The 4-3 ruling, written by Chief Justice Ronald George, found that it is
unconstitutional to deprive gays and lesbians of the equal right to walk
down the aisle with a government-issued marriage license in hand.
"The California Constitution properly must be interpreted to guarantee
this
basic civil right to all Californians, whether gay or hetero***ual, and to
same-*** couples as well as to opposite-*** couples," the court said in a
121-page decision that gives gays unprecedented rights.'
|
