In article
<e7b187a9-e240-443d-becc-5a2c20150a0d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
carlos <carlosmachina@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 16, 9:24 am, ray <xxxray...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > In article <g0kbvs$67...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > ray wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > >
<3a7f375d-5297-4b8d-aada-e9ca2ea19...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > > > carlos <carlosmach...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> > > >> On May 15, 3:57 pm, Filthy Canadian
> > > >> <MyQueenMumLove...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > >> > Man! Them dudes got it going don't they, eh!
> >
> > > >> > I always did have this thing about my 'lead' dog, Slope!
> >
> > > >> > It's a long way to travel, you know... all across the
country...
> > > >> > but it'll be worth it, eh!
> > > >> > Yeah, it'll be worth it! When I pound ole' Slope then, it'll be
> > > >> > legal!
> >
> > > >> > Oh... wait... does that mean I'll have to stay in CA?
> > > >> > I'm not sure the frogs will take to me and ole' Slope in the
same
> > > >> > bed!
> >
> > > >> > Oh well, only one way to find out, eh!
> >
> > > >> >http://tinyurl.com/4aajn6
> > > >> > --
> >
> > > >> > As always,
> > > >> > I B your
> > > >> > Filthy Stupid Socialist Frog Speaking Canadian
> > > >> > It's All For The Dogs, Eh
> >
> > > >> Hello,
> >
> > > >> I really doubt you could find even a dog that would marry you
> > > >> voluntarily. In California, both parties in the marriage have
to
> > > >> consent to be married.
> >
> > > > In a Republic, when people vote on something, the government is
> > > > supposed to respect that vote; not let one person change the very
law
> > > > people wanted to enact.
> >
> > > In a constitutional Republic, when people pass a law and that law is
in
> > > direct conflict with the Constitution, the government is supposed to
> > > repeal
> > > the law. We are a nation of laws, not men. In that way, we avoid
> > > tyranny
> > > of the majority.
> >
> > That is IF it's in the Constitution. The Constitution does not cover
> > marriage or who or what makes a legal marriage.
> >
> > --
> > All saints have a past--all sinners have a future
> >
> > Ronald Reagan
>
> Hello,
>
> The Constitution guarantees equal protection for all and the rights of
> anyone, including gays, to pursue happiness.
>
> If gays can't marry, they're being denied equal protection and the
> right to pursue happiness.
Equal protection does not include marriage. Marriage is not to be
protected because the definition of marriage is the legal union of man
and woman. If you want equal protection, complain about the Hate Crime
law that GIVES more protection to one group over another.
--
All saints have a past--all sinners have a future
Ronald Reagan
|
