Re: Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Letter to Congressman Robert

In article <487a6251$0$15589$ec3e2dad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Day Brown  <daybrown@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Vandar wrote:
>> Day Brown wrote:
>> 
>>> Al Dykes wrote:
>>>
>>>> Which has nothing to do with the engineering studies of the collapse
>>>> of the WTC towers. These studies may differ on details but all agree
>>>> that there is nothing that was caused by anything but the impact of
>>>> two jets.
>>>
>>> Inasmuch as you havent read or understood the studies on Group Think,
or
>>> seen the power of delusion demonstrated in them, how the **** would
you
>>> know?
>> 
>> You just described an aspect of the "truth" movement.
>> 
>>> If you'd also read Orwell's "1984", you'd realize he saw it coming.
>> 
>> If you had read "1984", you'd realize it's fiction.
>> 
>Shakespeare is fiction to. You either get it, or you dont. You dont. I 




What is the point of this rant on literature?  Everyone with expertise
in relevant fields; aviation crash analysis, structural engineering,
DNA, demolition, radar data analysis and many many, more topics , all
agree that 4 aircraft caused all the damage on 9/11.

People that claim otherwise refuse to speak in public with people with
relevant expertise and make thief case for man-made demolition or
whatever.






>frankly dont mind. I'm the one with the psych degree and experience in 
>clinical settings Vandar. I know neurosis when I see it. Its really 
>quite common, approaching a majority of the population and posters. And 
>yes, some of the neurotics are troofers.
>
>But it is far more telling of any random sample of the 911 postings that 
>it is the defenders of the official re****t who are driven to ad hominum 
>first. Not that anything I have to say to you and Al is persuasive.
>
>But here again, Dr. Freud is clear, neurosis is intractable, and when 
>you challenge the delusions of a neurotic, he gets angry, not educated. 
>So, shall we look back in the postings and see how often you guys have 
>called other posters names, and how often I have? or how I've limited my 
>comments to the facts we have at hand?
>
>Where is the NIST re****t on why WTC 7 collapsed? Gordon Ross shows us a 
>photo of the twin towers taken from across the river, and you can see 
>the core columns still standing above the cloud of dust after the floors 
>'pancaked'. I dont claim to know what happened. I dont actually have a 
>theory. I am awaiting a credible explanation, and have not seen any of 
>you present one.
>
>No, all this will simmer on the back burner until, as Dr. Freud says, 
>there is some traumatic event to wake up a neurotic. The most likely I 
>see now is the economic stress from high oil prices. when the dude gets 
>kicked off the couch cause they foreclosed on his house, he aint 
>watching TV any more and has time to think instead of being told what to 
>think.  And when he goes into bankruptcy, he suddenly sees lotsa other 
>things in the system dont add up either.
>
>You havent had time to read Machiavelli either, or you'd see how there's 
>a good chance some populist demagogue'll arise from obscurity promising
>the distressed middle class justice by seizing the assets of the rich to 
>balance the books again. 911 will provide him the excuse, the means to 
>say they have all been lying all this while. If gas prices and heating 
>bills are high enuf, and incomes are low enuf, sheeple will buy into it.


-- 
a d y k e s @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 p a n i x . c o m 

Don't blame me. I voted for Gore. A Proud signature since 2001

-- 
Al Dykes
 News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is
advertising.
    - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail