Re: Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Letter to Congressman Robert

Day Brown wrote:

> Vandar wrote:
> 
>>> Shakespeare is fiction to. You either get it, or you dont. You dont.
>>
>> I get that it's fiction. "Getting it" doesn't mean interpreting it as 
>> anything but what it is.
>>
>>> I frankly dont mind. I'm the one with the psych degree and experience 
>>> in clinical settings Vandar.
>>
>>
>> The former I doubt. The latter I do not.
> 
> Freshman & sophomore years at the U of Minn. Graduated the U of So Fla 
> in Tampa, 1971 with a minor in comp sci and extra work in statistics so 
> as to provide a better analysis of the psych experimental results.
> 
> Nietzsche, "The Genealogy of Theater" said that whereas Dionysianism (ie

> typical Native European religion) was based on works of theater claiming

> allegorical truth, the Levantine scriptures (ie the Bible) were based on

> works of literature claiming literal truth.
> 
> The neurotic mind can only deal with what it accepts as literal truth; 
> the ambiguity of allegorical truth is not tolerated. Thus, in the case 
> of 911, the official re****t is simple. 19 terrorists, 4 planes. end of 
> problem. The allegorical less of 911 has to do with the conflict going 
> back hundreds of years, with the monumental icon of the towers, and the 
> political necessity to motivate the American people to confront the 
> challenges by expansionist Islam and the oil money behind that.
> 
> Whatever the "truth" about 911 is, it is terribly complicated and none 
> of those involved in setting it up, or reacting to it, really understood

> everything that was going on. This was not a grand plot of a single mind

> like that of Ben Ladin. But its too complicated for you and Al, and many

> others to deal with. You want simple answers cause the rest of the world

> is too ambiguous the way it is. My sympathies.
> 
> But 911 aint over yet. The economic interactions the produced it havent 
> yet been played out. Oil money is still funding terrorism. Good Muslims 
> are still turning a blind eye to where the money for their schools comes

> from, or how it is being used to create more zealots; good Christians're

> still turning a blind eye to the hypocritical corruption of leaders.
> 
> I dont expect you guys to be convinced by any of this; I write simply 
> for the record in case some more rational mind wants to research this 
> time trying to figure out how the public could be so misled. Course, if 
> you'd read the studies by Milgram on Obedience, you'd see how easily the

> Germans were manipulated by Nazi propaganda and how blindly went along.
> 
> Had the US military read the studies by Zimbardo, which were done over 
> 30 years ago, Abu Gharib never would've happened. Had the interrogators 
> at Gitmo read http://paulekman.com
they'd know that waterboarding or any

> other kind of torture is obsolete. There are far more reliable methods 
> based on primate neurological studies to use.
> 
> But all that is too complicated for you and Al to deal with.

Not at all. It's just you bloviating about a topic which you obviously 
have very little understanding. Your complete lack of understanding 
causes you to believe that no one else is capable of understanding it 
either. You're wrong, but it's not possible for you to admit and accept 
that, so you concoct some half-assed reason that no one else understands 
it and declare yourself superior.

Now run along. I hear your two years of psych calling you.