Re: Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Letter to Congressman

In article <487ef5fa$0$2913$ec3e2dad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Day Brown  <daybrown@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>me wrote:
>>> Gordon Ross shows us a
>>> photo of the twin towers taken from across the river, and you can see
>>> the core columns still standing above the cloud of dust after the
floors
>>> 'pancaked'.
>> 
>>   So?  It's not like there were some 60 stories of them or so.  
>No, as a matter of fact, the core columns in the photo still standing 
>above the cloud of dust are still nearly as high as the other tower. I 
>dunno if that was 60, but at least 30 stories.
>
>Which raises two questions. 1- since the core columns no longer had to 
>sup****t the load, why did they fall? and 2- since they did, what broke 


Because they weren't strong enough to carry their own weight when the
structure they were part of collapsed.

No structural engineer in the entire world, not one , has demonstrated
that there is anything unusual about the way the core beams collapsed.

Not one. 



-- 
Al Dykes
 News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is
advertising.
    - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail