Re: Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Letter to Congressman Robert

In article <487f9b05$0$2929$ec3e2dad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Day Brown  <daybrown@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Al Dykes wrote:
>
>> A long list deleted and irrelevant to the fact that nobody with
>> relevant expertise says that anything but 4 hijacked commercial jets
>> caused all the destruction on 9/11.  Anyone that claims otherwise
>> refuses to make their case in front of any group with relevant
>> expertise.
>Al, can you explain why we must accept your definition of "relevant 
>expertise"? I have seen presentations by architects, engineers, and 



Prof.  Jones has to speak to and answer questions from chemical
metallurgists and demolition experts. Richard Gage speaks to
structural engineers and demolition experts.  The "pilots for truth"
speak with people that know aviation.  The IT guy that claims a power
down at WTC talks to people like me that ran floor-sized IT operations
and participated on construction projects in big Manhattan buildings.

This doesn't seem like rocket science.  Speaking to crowds of ignorant
people doesn't clarify anything.






-- 
Al Dykes
 News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is
advertising.
    - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail