Re: Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Letter to Congressman Robert

In article <487fe957$0$15533$ec3e2dad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Day Brown  <daybrown@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Al Dykes wrote:
>> In article <487f9b05$0$2929$ec3e2dad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> Day Brown  <daybrown@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> Al Dykes wrote:
>>>
>>>> A long list deleted and irrelevant to the fact that nobody with
>>>> relevant expertise says that anything but 4 hijacked commercial jets
>>>> caused all the destruction on 9/11.  Anyone that claims otherwise
>>>> refuses to make their case in front of any group with relevant
>>>> expertise.
>>> Al, can you explain why we must accept your definition of "relevant 
>>> expertise"? I have seen presentations by architects, engineers, and 
>
>> Prof.  Jones has to speak to and answer questions from chemical
>> metallurgists and demolition experts. Richard Gage speaks to
>> structural engineers and demolition experts.  The "pilots for truth"
>> speak with people that know aviation.  The IT guy that claims a power
>> down at WTC talks to people like me that ran floor-sized IT operations
>> and participated on construction projects in big Manhattan buildings.
>> 
>> This doesn't seem like rocket science.  Speaking to crowds of ignorant
>> people doesn't clarify anything.
>Jones is a demagogue; I understand that. I've seen many others besides 
>him. Debunkers always cite Jones, he's an easy jackass strawman. I've 
>seen others who didnt claim the divine revelations Jones does, who 
>merely point out certain facts from the video and other sources we have 
>to forgo the dramatic career, but make perfectly clear the official 
>re****t is deceptive and inadequate.
>
>You still have not defined what "relevant expertise" is. Mere


Structural engineering
Demolition.  
Metallurgy
Fire science
Aviation in general and aviation crash analysis, specifically.
DNA and medical forensics 
Radar experts 
Cell phone and airphone system engineers 


99.999% of the people with relevant expertise disagree with you. The
..001% that do don't have the balls to speak in front of people with
relevant expertise to defend their assertions.  They just sell books
and DVDs to people that are ignorant of relevant engineering,
aviation, and history.



-- 
Al Dykes
 News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is
advertising.
    - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail