Re: NY TIMES sheds all pretense of their Partisan Liberal Bias

MioMyo wrote:
> Now watch all the liberal sycophants here on Usenet come to their
defense.
> 
> This should be fun....
> 
> http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/21/mccain.nyt/index.html
> 
> (CNN) -- The New York Times has rejected an essay that Sen. John McCain 
> wrote defending his Iraq war policy.
> 
> The piece was in response to an op-ed from Sen. Barack Obama that was 
> published in the paper last week.
> 
> 
> McCain's rejected op-ed was a lengthy critique of Obama's positions on
Iraq 
> policy, particularly his view of the surge.
> 
> The article "is particularly disgusting -- an un-sourced hit-and-run
smear 
> campaign designed to distract from the issues at stake in this
election," 
> McCain's campaign manager, Rick Davis, wrote in a e-mail to sup****ters.


Honestly, it would have been a help to Obama if readers could have read 
McCain's critique of a program that eventually had Iraq run by Iraqis. 
Instead of having a plan, McCain just wants to leave our troops there 
until the USA runs out of money to pay Blackwater mercenaries.

1. McCain has no plans about Iraq.
2. McCain tears into anyone would suggest peace.
3. The NY Times is not a liberal bastion of truth.
4. McCain's handlers can't write a politically savvy message to a media 
giant that softballs everything from the Republican Party.
5. You would hear more stories of McCain's campaigning incompetence if 
the cor****ate media were liberal. Instead, you have attacks against 
Michelle Obama, as though she were a campaign issue.
6. There is only one real candidate that many Americans would sup****t, 
but don't because they are cowed each election to vote against the 
Republican. That's what Republicans have been reduced to since Reagan: 
bogymen.

http://www.runcynthiarun.org

She makes Obama look like the cor****atist whore that he is.