Re: NY TIMES stops ****lling for McCain

"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:4886A9FC.A582F1CE@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> MioMyo wrote:
>>
>> Keep deluding yourself into believing you speak on my behalf
kimmey-boy, 
>> you
>> demagoguing prick.  I'm utterly satisfied the Times is so entrenched in
>> their bias, that they can't understand why Americans continue rejecting

>> them
>
> SO entrenched the Times endorsed McCain... THat's pretty liberal.

That was the primary and they endorsed the a RINO. They also endorsed a 
liberal for the dems, you lying freaking idiot.....

>> on the stock market and in sales.
>>
>> Maybe can could explain why they find new lows in each just about every

>> year
>> kimmey. However we both know all you are really able to do is more of 
>> your
>> "translation" circus act.......
>>
>> "Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> > "MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >> "Phisher KIng" <locker2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >> >
>> >> > The NYT has published SEVEN (7), thats "S E V E N" editorials
>> >> > previously
>> >> > that were written by Senator McCain. Nitwit.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Notably, you Failed... that is FAILED to refute the Times obvious
and
>> >> blatant Liberal Bias, you sycophant liberal moron.....
>> >
>> > Translation: "Notably I failed.  The Times has run McSame's
boilerplate
>> > many
>> > times, but this empty-headed piece of crap -- where he calls for 
>> > 'victory'
>> > but can't define it -- went too far. It's notable that McSame -- who
>> > thinks
>> > Iraq and Pakistan share a border -- refused to have his ghost writers

>> > deal
>> > with the Times' valid objections."
>> >
>> >