Re: NY TIMES sheds all pretense of their Partisan Liberal Bias

On Jul 22, 7:49=A0pm, "MioMyo" <USA_Patr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "fukgo116" <fargo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:fccc0736-ec04-4d94-be35-b51f63df6afe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Jul 22, 6:42 am, "MioMyo" <USA_Patr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > "Phisher KIng" <lock...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> > > The NYT has published SEVEN (7), thats "S E V E N" editorials
previou=
sly
> > > that were written by Senator McCain. Nitwit.
>
> > Notably, you Failed... that is FAILED to refute the Times obvious and
> > blatant Liberal Bias, you sycophant liberal moron
>
> <McCain's last editorial was nothing new.
>
> It's laughable how all liberals on the talk circuit and here on Usenet
ar=
e
> parroting this same talking point. You lemmings are well trained useful
> idiots who can't think or speak an original thought. =A0On thing for
sure=
 can
> be said, you morons an at least remember a line....

How about this one, Yo-Yo? The NYT didn't run McCain's editorial
because they couldn't read his shaky, old man handwriting.

Clipping off what I wrote does not help your case, Yo-Yo. You look
sneaky and dishonest. Here's what you said I wrote:

<McCain's last editorial was nothing new.

Here's what I ACTUALLY wrote:

"McCain's last editorial was nothing new. Yo-Yo. Obama's was.
Therefore the Times told him to try again. The NYT doesn't exist to
print McCain's stump speech over and over. That's what his campaign is
for."

Now, did you ever see combat during the Vietnam war? You've only been
asked 468 times.

S. Olson