Re: NY TIMES stops ****lling for McCain

On Jul 22, 7:53=A0pm, "MioMyo" <USA_Patr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kim...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > The Boston Herald ran it, and it was typical of McCain's vacuous,
> > empty-headed sup****t of Bush's war. =A0He claimed we had to press on
to
> > "victory" but never defined what "victory" would look like.
>
> Moron, it's uprecedented and unbelievably arrogant of the Times to think
> they have the right to condensendingly tell McCain what he should write
i=
n
> his response.

Yeah, they just OWN the paper. Who do they think they are insisting on
standard of newsworthiness?

Look at it this way, Yo-Yo. It lets mental midgets like you scream
that 'liberal bias' charge. You get to do your favorite whine: "I''m
being PICKED on!"

Now,. did you ever see combat during the Vietnam war?

470 times you've been asked now.

S. Olson