Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Republicans in The USA > Re: Medical exp...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 19 of 36 Topic 152249 of 163961
Post > Topic >>

Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?

by znuybv <thowilson@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 24, 2008 at 01:44 PM

On Jul 24, 4:17 am, 1Z <peterdjo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On 24 Jul, 03:26, Enough Already <enough_alre...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > It has been suggested more than once that arch-conservatives lack an
> > "empathy gene," which may be discovered at some point. You can spot
> > future 'wingers as early as kindergarten, with their me-first, I-got-
> > mine attitudes.
>
>
http://www.wam.umd.edu/~hannahk/bulletin.pdfhttp://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2003/07/22_politics.shtml

You say you are a liberal.
Do you believe the following?

       1.
          Standards for admissions to universities, fire departments,
etc. should be lowered for people of color.
       2.
          Bilingual education for children of immigrants, rather than
immersion in English, is good for them and for America.
       3.
          Murderers should never be put to death.
       4.
          During the Cold War, America should have adopted a nuclear
arms freeze.
       5.
          Colleges should not allow ROTC programs.
       6.
          It was wrong to wage war against Saddam Hussein in the Gulf
War.
       7.
          Poor parents should not be allowed to have vouchers to send
their children to private schools.
       8.
          It is good that trial lawyers and teachers unions are the
two biggest contributors to the Democratic Party.
       9.
          Marriage should be redefined from male-female to any two
people.
      10.
          A married couple should not have more of a right to adopt a
child than two men or two women.
      11.
          The Boy Scouts should not be allowed to use parks or any
other public places and should be prohibited from using churches and
synagogues for their meetings.
      12.
          The present high tax rates are good.
      13.
          Speech codes on college campuses are good and American
values are bad.
      14.
          The Israelis and Palestinians are morally equivalent.
      15.
          The United Nations is a moral force for good in the world,
and therefore America should be subservient to it and such
international institutions as a world court.
      16.
          It is good that colleges have dropped hundreds of men's
s****ts teams in order to meet gender-based quotas.
      17.
          No abortions can be labeled immoral.
      18.
          Restaurants should be prohibited by law from allowing
customers to choose between a smoking and a non-smoking section.
      19.
          High schools should make condoms available to students and
teach them how to use them.
      20.
          Racial profiling for terrorists is wrong -- a white American
grandmother should as likely be searched as a Saudi young male.
      21.
          Racism and poverty -- not a lack of fathers and a crisis of
values -- are the primary causes of violent crime in the inner city.
      22.
          It is wrong and unconstitutional for students to be told,
"God bless you" at their graduation.
      23.
          No culture is morally superior to any other.

Those are all liberal positions. How many of them do you hold?
 




 36 Posts in Topic:
Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Enough Already <enough  2008-07-23 19:26:35 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-07-23 22:50:33 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-07-24 05:20:30 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
"Ouroboros_Rex"  2008-07-25 09:58:29 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-07-25 13:56:26 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Gary DeWaay <dewaay2sp  2008-07-26 01:48:41 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
1Z <peterdjones@[EMAIL  2008-07-24 04:17:43 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
hal@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-24 06:48:07 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-07-24 14:21:17 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
"Ouroboros_Rex"  2008-07-24 13:51:28 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-07-25 13:48:22 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
"OneTwoThree" &  2008-07-24 08:52:30 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Dan <dnadan56@[EMAIL P  2008-07-24 10:40:10 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-07-24 15:44:29 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-07-24 16:12:41 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-07-25 02:26:51 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
znuybv <thowilson@[EMA  2008-07-24 13:36:58 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-07-24 17:11:27 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
znuybv <thowilson@[EMA  2008-07-24 13:44:00 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Jeff McCann <NoSpam@[E  2008-07-24 17:05:10 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-07-25 13:36:47 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Gary DeWaay <dewaay2sp  2008-07-26 01:45:40 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
pyotr filipivich <pham  2008-07-24 13:43:04 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
dogsabc4@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-25 07:25:42 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Enough Already <enough  2008-07-26 10:36:18 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-07-27 04:55:51 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Enough Already <enough  2008-07-26 10:42:06 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Enough Already <enough  2008-07-26 10:52:04 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Enough Already <enough  2008-07-26 11:07:49 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Lloyd <lparker@[EMAIL   2008-07-26 12:10:21 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
A Veteran <georgewkspa  2008-07-27 22:04:04 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-07-28 02:25:37 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Rich Travsky <traRvEsk  2008-07-26 22:49:48 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Dan <dnadan56@[EMAIL P  2008-07-27 16:44:05 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-07-29 04:27:53 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
znuybv <thowilson@[EMA  2008-07-27 10:33:43 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 10:09:26 CST 2008.