Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Republicans in The USA > Re: Medical exp...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 20 of 36 Topic 152249 of 163961
Post > Topic >>

Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?

by Jeff McCann <NoSpam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 24, 2008 at 05:05 PM

znuybv wrote:
> On Jul 24, 4:17 am, 1Z <peterdjo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On 24 Jul, 03:26, Enough Already <enough_alre...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>> It has been suggested more than once that arch-conservatives lack an
>>> "empathy gene," which may be discovered at some point. You can spot
>>> future 'wingers as early as kindergarten, with their me-first, I-got-
>>> mine attitudes.
>>
http://www.wam.umd.edu/~hannahk/bulletin.pdfhttp://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2003/07/22_politics.shtml
> 
> You say you are a liberal.
> Do you believe the following?

Ah, the fallacy of false premises, and, a typical Rightard 
mischaracterization, as well

>        1.
>           Standards for admissions to universities, fire departments,
> etc. should be lowered for people of color.

The only affirmative action program Rightards defend is Legacy 
admissions.  As a firefighter, I can tell you that there was a long 
history of prejudice against women and minorities in the Fire Service. 
Strong action was required to overcome this.  It's not about lower 
standards, it's about fair and reasonable standards.

         2.
>           Bilingual education for children of immigrants, rather than
> immersion in English, is good for them and for America.

Bilingual education is intended to prepare students for learning in 
English, without setting them up to fall behind or flounder in the 
meantime.  Which is the better approach is still an open question, 
except to ideologues.

>        3.
>           Murderers should never be put to death.

Most of Western civilization outside America thinks so.

>        4.
>           During the Cold War, America should have adopted a nuclear
> arms freeze.

Arms limitations were certainly a part of the process of ending the Cold 
War.

>        5.
>           Colleges should not allow ROTC programs.

More of an anti-war than a true liberal position.  Liberals sup****t a 
broad range of academic programs.

>        6.
>           It was wrong to wage war against Saddam Hussein in the Gulf
> War.

It was ill-planned and ill-executed.  Moreover, containment was working, 
and such notable Conservatives as George Bush the Elder and Colin Powell 
argued strongly against it.

>        7.
>           Poor parents should not be allowed to have vouchers to send
> their children to private schools.


Liberals believe in universal free public education.  Conservatives don't.

>        8.
>           It is good that trial lawyers and teachers unions are the
> two biggest contributors to the Democratic Party.

First, I question the premise.  Second, it's as least as good as the US 
Chamber of Commerce and other large commercial, industry, trade and 
business groups sup****ting Republicans.

>        9.
>           Marriage should be redefined from male-female to any two
> people.

The state has no role in "marriage," which is a purely religious 
institution.  So far as the state is concerned, marriage is merely a 
bundle of legal and contractual rights and privileges that cannot 
constitutionally be withheld because of the gender of the parties.

>       10.
>           A married couple should not have more of a right to adopt a
> child than two men or two women.

Prospective adoptive parents, including singles and homo***ual couples, 
ought to be *****sed on their individual merits.  Only a heartless 
bastard or a Conservative would think children are better off being 
raised in an institution than by fit and loving adoptive parents.

>       11.
>           The Boy Scouts should not be allowed to use parks or any
> other public places and should be prohibited from using churches and
> synagogues for their meetings.

Constitutionally, public property ought not be used on favorable terms 
by organizations that discriminate on religious grounds.

>       12.
>           The present high tax rates are good.

No, but runaway and reckless Republican spending, resulting in record 
deficits and the mortgaging of the country to China, has to be paid for. 
  The Republican "solution" of leaving this debt for our grandchildren 
to pay is manifestly unfair and unwise.


>       13.
>           Speech codes on college campuses are good and American
> values are bad.

Speech codes are generally bad and probably unconstitutional, as well. 
As for "American values," that depends entirely on how those values are 
defined.

>       14.
>           The Israelis and Palestinians are morally equivalent.

First, there are no such persons as "Palestinians."  Second, not 
everything Israel does should enjoy the blind, unquestioning sup****t 
from America that, especially, religious Conservatives seem to think 
ought to be given to anything Israel wants.

>       15.
>           The United Nations is a moral force for good in the world,
> and therefore America should be subservient to it and such
> international institutions as a world court.

The UN is very, very far from good, but it is the best tool available 
for certain purposes, and it is not the Pure Evil that Conservatives 
pretend it is every time it's members fail to bow to our will.

America is the progenitor of the concept of "World Courts."  Ever hear 
of the Nuremberg trials?  We were the ones who pushed for the concepts 
of international law and justice, and we entered into certain treaties 
in that regard.  However, some Conservatives are now very worried by 
these concepts, given their complicity in war crimes and human rights 
violations.

>       16.
>           It is good that colleges have dropped hundreds of men's
> s****ts teams in order to meet gender-based quotas.

No, but it's great the women's participation in collegiate athletics is 
at an all-time high.

>       17.
>           No abortions can be labeled immoral.

You're confused.  The morality of abortion, or anything else, is a 
private matter.  The issue is only whether some types of abortion will 
be legal, or not.  Note that abortions will continue in either case.

>       18.
>           Restaurants should be prohibited by law from allowing
> customers to choose between a smoking and a non-smoking section.

Hmm.  The anti-smoking crowd contains many conservatives as well as 
liberals.

>       19.
>           High schools should make condoms available to students and
> teach them how to use them.

The Conservatives "gag rule" against teaching reproductive biology and 
insisting on "abstinence only" eduction has proved to be a dismal 
failure, but it is a triumph of the Conservative's preference for 
ideology over science.  Only a Conservative would believe that factual, 
scientifically valid information could be harmful if taught to children. 
  But I do sup****t allowing parents to "opt out" their children if they 
wish.

>       20.
>           Racial profiling for terrorists is wrong -- a white American
> grandmother should as likely be searched as a Saudi young male.

No, but DWB (Driving While Black) and other forms of hassling people 
based solely on race is a problem.

>       21.
>           Racism and poverty -- not a lack of fathers and a crisis of
> values -- are the primary causes of violent crime in the inner city.

No, but we recognize that the former are significant contributing causes 
to the latter.

>       22.
>           It is wrong and unconstitutional for students to be told,
> "God bless you" at their graduation.

It is plainly unconstitutional for government officials to offer 
sectarian prayers at government functions, especially those that young 
people are required to attend, such as school.  Likewise, it is 
unconstitutional to unreasonably restrict the free exercise of religion 
by students or staff, such as preventing reading of the Bible during 
free reading time, restricting wearing of religious symbols, or 
restricting students from discussing religion or having religious 
organizations at school on the same basis as any other.

>       23.
>           No culture is morally superior to any other.

As opposed to the view that America is so morally superior and unique 
that it is our God given duty to impose our views on other people and 
nations, by force if necessary?


> 
> Those are all liberal positions. 
Patently false assertion.

You say you are a Conservative.
Do you believe the following?

1.	Investing American Tax dollars in rebuilding Iraq's infrastructure is 
good, but Investing American Tax dollars in rebuilding America's 
infrastructure is bad.

2.	Deficit spending is only bad when Democrats do it.

3.	America's tax burden should be paid by taxes on active labor, but not 
by taxes on passive gains in wealth.

4.	The capacity of the Earth to absorb pollution without detrimental 
effects for humanity is infinite, and it's resources are endless.

5.	Major oil companies could not afford to invest in new production 
without massive tax subsidies.

6.	Tree-hugging environmentalists have blocked the efforts of major oil 
companies to build new refineries.

7.	It is wrong for the government to use it's market power to pay less 
than full retail prices for pharmaceuticals.

8.	Social Security and Medicare, which are not need-based, are not 
socialism, but need-based social welfare programs like food stamps are 
socialism and morally wrong.

9.	Massive farm subsidies, which largely go to major agri-cor****ations 
like Archer-Daniels-Midland, are a morally right.

10.	Science, especially the science taught in public schools or used to 
determine public policy, should not be allowed to conflict with the 
received wisdom of organized religion.

11.	America has an unlimited right to impose it's will on foreign 
peoples and nations by force.

12.	Secretly arresting American citizens in America on the whim of the 
executive and holding them incommunicado for up to life, without access 
to a lawyer, any contact with family or the outside world, or any due 
process rights whatsoever, com****ts with our Constitution and American 
values.

13.	Torture is Constitutional, an effective means of garnering useful 
intelligence, and a good way to improve America's standing and moral 
leader****p in the World.

14.	The plain language of the Fourth, Fifth and Eighth Amendments 
doesn't mean what it says, and only the Second Amendment does.

15.	The Legislative and Judicial branches of the Federal Government are 
subordinate to the Executive branch, and the President is free to ignore 
any laws he doesn't like.

Those are all Conservative positions.

Jeff
 




 36 Posts in Topic:
Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Enough Already <enough  2008-07-23 19:26:35 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-07-23 22:50:33 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-07-24 05:20:30 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
"Ouroboros_Rex"  2008-07-25 09:58:29 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-07-25 13:56:26 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Gary DeWaay <dewaay2sp  2008-07-26 01:48:41 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
1Z <peterdjones@[EMAIL  2008-07-24 04:17:43 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
hal@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-24 06:48:07 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-07-24 14:21:17 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
"Ouroboros_Rex"  2008-07-24 13:51:28 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-07-25 13:48:22 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
"OneTwoThree" &  2008-07-24 08:52:30 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Dan <dnadan56@[EMAIL P  2008-07-24 10:40:10 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-07-24 15:44:29 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-07-24 16:12:41 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-07-25 02:26:51 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
znuybv <thowilson@[EMA  2008-07-24 13:36:58 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-07-24 17:11:27 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
znuybv <thowilson@[EMA  2008-07-24 13:44:00 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Jeff McCann <NoSpam@[E  2008-07-24 17:05:10 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-07-25 13:36:47 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Gary DeWaay <dewaay2sp  2008-07-26 01:45:40 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
pyotr filipivich <pham  2008-07-24 13:43:04 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
dogsabc4@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-25 07:25:42 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Enough Already <enough  2008-07-26 10:36:18 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-07-27 04:55:51 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Enough Already <enough  2008-07-26 10:42:06 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Enough Already <enough  2008-07-26 10:52:04 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Enough Already <enough  2008-07-26 11:07:49 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Lloyd <lparker@[EMAIL   2008-07-26 12:10:21 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
A Veteran <georgewkspa  2008-07-27 22:04:04 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-07-28 02:25:37 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Rich Travsky <traRvEsk  2008-07-26 22:49:48 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Dan <dnadan56@[EMAIL P  2008-07-27 16:44:05 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-07-29 04:27:53 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
znuybv <thowilson@[EMA  2008-07-27 10:33:43 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 10:07:59 CST 2008.