Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Republicans in The USA > Re: Medical exp...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 26 of 36 Topic 152249 of 163955
Post > Topic >>

Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?

by strabo <strabo@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 27, 2008 at 04:55 AM

Enough Already wrote:
> On Jul 24, 2:20 am, strabo <str...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>> It is not that conservatives lack an "empathy gene", rather, the
>> problem is that liberal progressives have a "bleeding heart gene"
>> which clouds their judgment.
> 
> I'm no "liberal" in that sense. I'm talking about hard-line
> conservatives who don't give a crap about anything they can't
> monetarily benefit from. Save the liberal analysis for another time -
> I'd probably agree with much of it.
> 


>> He has made it clear in recent years that autism is often an
>> inappropriate and misused diagnosis. The motives for this
>> zealous insistence that millions of children are autistic are
>> greed and emotional need.
> 
> The man claimed that 99% of autistic kids are just brats. He was
> pu****ng statistics way too far.
> 

True, it's probably more like 80%.

 >
>> Global warming is speculation, not science. It is a propaganda ploy
>> to manipulate thought for political control. Works well don't it?
> 
> You've been successfully brainwashed by Creationist counter-
> propaganda, I see. Science is just fine until it questions the greed
> imperative. The blessed "economy" is considered independent of the
> natural processes that allow it to exist in the first place.
> 
>>  > Anything that upsets a 'winger's
>>
>>> personally sensibility is blamed on whining, conspiracies or junk
>>> science. Their approach to life is simple: If it's not all about MY
>>> needs and it can't make ME money, eff it!
>> It is not conservatives who are emotionally and monetarily benefiting
>> from the diagnosis of autism.
> 
> I notice you didn't deny that general concept, though. You know it's
> true. See subject line.
> 
>> It is not conservatives who are emotionally and monetarily benefiting
>> from claims of global warming.
> 
> No, it's the future of your own life, actually, if you're around long
> enough. You're stuck in a denial loop, like the 50 million+ Americans
> who've rationalized away the dangers of smoking. How can they be
> expected to care about the whole world if they willingly trash their
> own bodies? People are small-minded about many things.
> 

Some of us are also realistic.

Global warming has been shown to be cyclic and its causes are
many. We do not know if we are entering such a cycle.

Your critique of money-grubbing deceivers and thieves is confused
by references to 'conservatives'.  The greedy and corrupt exist among
Republicans and Democrats. Political Conservatives promote minimal
government and Constitutional law. They do not compromise those
principles.

So, to make any sense you need to drop the labels and concentrate
on ideology.




 >
> E.A.
> 
> http://enough_already.tripod.com/
> 
> In terms of biology and geology, the net effect of human activity is
> depletion.


----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.pronews.com
The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000
Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
 




 36 Posts in Topic:
Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Enough Already <enough  2008-07-23 19:26:35 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-07-23 22:50:33 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-07-24 05:20:30 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
"Ouroboros_Rex"  2008-07-25 09:58:29 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-07-25 13:56:26 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Gary DeWaay <dewaay2sp  2008-07-26 01:48:41 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
1Z <peterdjones@[EMAIL  2008-07-24 04:17:43 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
hal@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-24 06:48:07 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-07-24 14:21:17 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
"Ouroboros_Rex"  2008-07-24 13:51:28 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-07-25 13:48:22 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
"OneTwoThree" &  2008-07-24 08:52:30 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Dan <dnadan56@[EMAIL P  2008-07-24 10:40:10 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-07-24 15:44:29 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-07-24 16:12:41 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-07-25 02:26:51 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
znuybv <thowilson@[EMA  2008-07-24 13:36:58 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-07-24 17:11:27 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
znuybv <thowilson@[EMA  2008-07-24 13:44:00 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Jeff McCann <NoSpam@[E  2008-07-24 17:05:10 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-07-25 13:36:47 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Gary DeWaay <dewaay2sp  2008-07-26 01:45:40 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
pyotr filipivich <pham  2008-07-24 13:43:04 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
dogsabc4@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-25 07:25:42 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Enough Already <enough  2008-07-26 10:36:18 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-07-27 04:55:51 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Enough Already <enough  2008-07-26 10:42:06 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Enough Already <enough  2008-07-26 10:52:04 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Enough Already <enough  2008-07-26 11:07:49 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Lloyd <lparker@[EMAIL   2008-07-26 12:10:21 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
A Veteran <georgewkspa  2008-07-27 22:04:04 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-07-28 02:25:37 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Rich Travsky <traRvEsk  2008-07-26 22:49:48 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
Dan <dnadan56@[EMAIL P  2008-07-27 16:44:05 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-07-29 04:27:53 
Re: Medical explanation for hard-line conservatism?
znuybv <thowilson@[EMA  2008-07-27 10:33:43 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 7:46:12 CST 2008.