Re: NY TIMES stops ****lling for McCain

"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:Y_9ik.17225$jI5.10674@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:LNWdnW_YPLxy6xXVnZ2dnUVZ_uLinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > "MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > news:lfFhk.16043$mh5.10948@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >> news:4886A9FC.A582F1CE@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > MioMyo wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Keep deluding yourself into believing you speak on my behalf
> > kimmey-boy,
> >> >> you
> >> >> demagoguing prick.  I'm utterly satisfied the Times is so
entrenched
> >> >> in
> >> >> their bias, that they can't understand why Americans continue
> >> >> rejecting
> >> >> them
> >> >
> >> > SO entrenched the Times endorsed McCain... THat's pretty liberal.
> >>
> >> That was the primary and they endorsed the a RINO. They also endorsed
a
> >> liberal for the dems, you lying freaking idiot.....
> >
> > McCain voted the Bush party line something like 96% of the time.  How
does
> > that make him a RINO?
>
> I wouldn't be surprise to hear you opine that McCain is on the extreme
right
> wing.
>
> Newsflash: neither he nor Bush are!
>

Translation: "The rightwing is now so discredited that I have to pretend
that McCain and Bush aren't rightwingnuts.  They just follow the party
line
nearly all the time."