Let's make it simple, even for a moron like you.
There were two (prominent) horse races, a republican primary and a
democrat
one. Therefore, the times picked two horses, one in each race.
I am happy that's confusing and extremely complex concept for a lying
liberal idiot such as yourself.
Why don't you check who the times picked in the 2000 republican primary?
That is if you want to look the fool you are, lib......
"RichTravsky" <traRvEsky@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:488FD3C5.64886437@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> MioMyo wrote:
>>
>> Moron, that was their Republican Primary choice which speaks volumes
>> about
>
> Moron, they endorsed Clinton. Ergo, they backed McFlipflop and its
costing
> them.
>
>> McCain.I didn't pay attention to who their dem choice was but I'd lay
>> odds
>> it was either Clinton or bamby, probably bamby......
>>
>> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> > MioMyo wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Couldn't happen to a more liberally partisan democrat
mouth-piece.....
>> >
>> > http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/25/opinion/25fri2.html
>> > Primary Choices: John McCain
>> >
>> > We have strong disagreements with all the Republicans running for
>> > president.
>> > The leading candidates have no plan for getting American troops out
of
>> > Iraq.
>> > They are too wedded to discredited economic theories and unwilling
even
>> > now
>> > to break with the legacy of President Bush. We disagree with them
>> > strongly
>> > on what makes a good Supreme Court justice.
>> >
>> > Still, there is a choice to be made, and it is an easy one. Senator
>> > John
>> > McCain of Arizona is the only Republican who promises to end the
George
>> > Bush
>> > style of governing from and on behalf of a small, angry fringe. With
a
>> > record
>> > of working across the aisle to develop sound bipartisan legislation,
he
>> > would
>> > offer a choice to a broader range of Americans than the rest of the
>> > Republican
>> > field.
>> > ...
>> >
>> >>
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0887d6aa-58da-11dd-a093-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1
>> >>
>> >> The New York Times suffered a 16.4 per cent decrease in June
>> >> advertising
>> >> revenues and warned on Wednesday that the effects of high oil
prices,
>> >> a
>> >> slowing economy and the housing crisis were likely to weigh on its
>> >> prospects
>> >> for some time.
>> >>
>> >> "I think it's clear that many of the advertising budgets are
>> >> tightening
>> >> up,"
>> >> said Janet Robinson, chief executive of the New York Times Company,
>> >> predicting a "tough" second half of the year.
>> >>
>> >> The June performance followed an 11.9 per cent decline in May
>> >> advertising
>> >> revenues, and suggested that an already deep erosion in newspaper
>> >> advertising could be accelerating. Ms Robinson said the company
would
>> >> respond by raising newsstand prices for the New York Times from
$1.25
>> >> to
>> >> $1.50 per copy beginning in August, marking the paper's second
>> >> increase
>> >> in a
>> >> year.
>> >>
>> >> That announcement came as the company re****ted that second-quarter
>> >> profits
>> >> fell 82 per cent to $21m, or 15 cents per share, compared with the
>> >> same
>> >> period a year ago, when it benefited from a $94m gain from the sale
of
>> >> television stations.
>> >>
>> >> Excluding that and other one-time events, income from continuing
>> >> operations
>> >> was down 5.5 per cent for the quarter. Revenue fell 6 per cent to
>> >> $742m.
>> >>
>> >> The New York Times Company's results were the latest sign of gloom
>> >> from
>> >> the
>> >> newspaper industry, which is now feeling the effects of a slowing
>> >> economy
>> >> as
>> >> it grapples with an ongoing migration of readers and advertisers to
>> >> the
>> >> internet.
>> >>
>> >> Gannett, the largest US newspaper chain, last week re****ted a 36 per
>> >> cent
>> >> decline in second-quarter earnings, including a 17 per cent drop in
>> >> advertising at its flag****p USA Today newspaper.
>> >>
>> >> Times' executives on Wednesday pointed to weakness in a variety of
>> >> advertising categories, including Hollywood studios, department
>> >> stores,
>> >> technology products and telecommunications.
>> >>
>> >> Among the worst-hit was real estate classified ads, which first
moved
>> >> online
>> >> to lower-cost competitors and are now drying up altogether in hard
hit
>> >> property markets like California.
>> >>
>> >> This year, the New York Times offered voluntary redundancies to
about
>> >> 100
>> >> newsroom employees, a rare step for a paper that has prided itself
on
>> >> adding
>> >> journalists even while competitors were retrenching. The company
said
>> >> on
>> >> Wednesday that the voluntary buy-outs were expected to cost
$40m-$50m.
>> >>
>> >> One bright spot for the company was its About.com website, where
>> >> revenues
>> >> increased 15.8 per cent to $28.6m amid higher advertising. That
helped
>> >> its
>> >> internet revenues grow 12.8 per cent to $91.3m for the quarter,
>> >> accounting
>> >> for 12.3 per cent of its total revenues.
|
