Re: Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Letter to Congressman

On Aug 2, 10:47=A0am, Day Brown <daybr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> agen...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 02:38:23 -0500, Day Brown <daybr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > wrote:
>
> >> Iarnrod wrote:
> >>> On Jul 31, 8:49 pm, animal02 <wherew...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>> Is it just me, or has the level of 911 kooktards taken a rapid
decli=
ne?
> >>> No, it's true. The kookers are inbreeding to such an extent that
what
> >>> little intelligence there was that had been necessary to make them
> >>> mildly amusing has now disappered from the gene pool.
>
> >>> They are boring. I have had to resort to Judge Joe Brown for my
daily
> >>> yucks.
> >> In asmuch as all you debunkers can do is engage in ad hominum,
>
> > Only because you're a latecomer to the discussion. =A0Everything has
> > been explained ad nauseum to "twoofers" so many times that it is
> > ridiculous to do it again.
>
> >> it suggests the truthers are onto something.
>
> > A statement that suggests that you don't have a clue.
>
> >> I dont claim to know what that
> >> is, but their posts are clearly more organized than one liner cheap
sh=
ots.
>
> > Go back over the last SEVEN years of postings in alt.conspiracy and
> > try that conclusion again.
>
> I noted the ad hominum began immediately. I recall there were kooks,
> with no evidence at all, claiming there was a conspiracy, but then later
> everyone who noted some logical discrepancy in the official re****t was
> also labled a kook.

There was no one who noted any logical discrepancy in any re****t, Day.

What do you "think" that was and we will be happy to be of asistance
to you.

> And I see you still assume anyone who challenges
> your position is ill informed or irrational.

Only when they are. It's not our fault the kookers are always wrong.
It's their fault.

> I dont recall any debunker who was not quickly driven to ad hominum in
> these threads, and while many of the truthers have also responded in the
> same manner, all those I can think of who tried merely to carry on a
> rational discourse were slandered.

There has been *no* kooker who has carried on a rational discourse.
All of them have been irrational. They propose physically impossible
theories that we have completely disproven. What more can be said
about them but "kook-a-doodle-dooooo??"

> I dont have a conspiracy theory I'd
> care to defend so much as see enuf to give me pause for doubt.

Such as what?? You've never once put up anything that is open to
question, but if you try again we can help you.