Re: Prayer at public meetings under attack...again

Bob Officer <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in 
news:bnmi649lflfemire74g9a9h376jlgilq02@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:15:23 -0400, in alt.abortion, "J"
> <Jvisions@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>>http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=157778
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Prayer at public meetings under attack...again
> 
> The government and the elected and appointed official are bound by
> law to represent the people, praying to god, for guidance or any
> thing else prior to the meeting makes them representatives of their
> religion and not the electorate.
> 
> No government meetings should ever invoke the name of any god.
> 
> 

In case you have never heard of it the USA has  something aclled the 
constitution the fisr amendment reads:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the 
free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the
press; or the right of 
the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a
redress of 
grievances.
Note the phrase "freadon of religion" not freedon from religion or the 
freedom to exclude religion as you and the liberal cabal seem to want it 
to say. It means if I want to pray to God, or read aloud the torah or 
site koranic verses at a public meeting I have every right to. By 
denying me that YOU are abridging my freedom of speech, you 
opressionistic fascist. Take it for what you will it is my God given.... 
er.. um... my constitutionally guaranteed right. Only activist judge and 
liberal fascistswould even have the audacity to try to deny me that 
right.