On Jul 5, 9:51 am, "free.tun...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <free.tun...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> On Jul 5, 10:37 am, Starkiller <NoSpam.SKS_SK...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 08:26:28 -0700 (PDT), "free.tun...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
>
> > <free.tun...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >On Jul 5, 10:04 am, "JakTheHammer" <jakthh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >> "Pers3id" <pers...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> > >>news:Rt-dnXzVZphSUvPVnZ2dnUVZ_tfinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > >> > On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 21:09:51 -0400, FACE wrote:
>
> > >> >>http://www.iraqbodycount.org/
>
> > >> >> Iraq Body Count
>
> > >> >> Iraq Body Count is an ongoing human security project which
> > >> >> maintains and
> > >> >> updates the world's largest public database of violent
> > >> >> civilian deaths
> > >> >> during and since the 2003 invasion. The count encomp*****
> > >> >> non-combatants
> > >> >> killed by military or paramilitary action and the breakdown in
> > >> >> civil
> > >> >> security following the invasion.
>
> > >> >> Do***ented civilian deaths from violence
>
> > >> >> 85,409 - 93,154
>
> > >> > Is this a 1 month figure ? Another university study put the
> > >> > total figure at an
> > >> > estimated 500,000 ... and that was 2 years ago.
>
> > >> >> From the Database
>
> > >> > That's pretty sad when they have to build a database to count
> > >> > bodies. Think of all
> > >> > those kids who would have parents if only GWB hadn't stolen the
> > >> > 2000 election.
>
> > >> We Rightards are smart when it comes to twisting fact.......We
> > >> **** with the real number, we use decimal number to make thing
> > >> look rosy like our current economy for example, body count
> > >> etc.........Don't you remember at our Foxnews? We repeat very day
> > >> calling ourselves "The
> > >> Truth".......Heehee.........Donchaknow...............
>
> > >What I find perplexing is their argument over the actual number...as
> > >if a few thousand innocent civilians here or there made their murders
> > >all legit.
>
> > The difference between 90,000 and 500,000 is more than "a few
> > thousand".
> > And since when did any of you give two ****s about civilian deaths?
> > You all damn sure didn't give a rats ass when a democrat was bombing
> > their ***** from 30,000 feet. You didn't give a flying **** about
> > civilians when a democrat bombed the **** out of the Balkans
> > "murdering" thousands of innocents.
> > Your blatent hypocrisy is duly noted yet again.
>
> You just proved my point. Bush's war, based on a lie, bankrupting the
> entire nation, murdering 4,000+ GIs is all OK....I live in St Louis,
> we have 6,000 Bosnian refugees here, who are doing great. You think
> they left because they like American Idol? You did not see genocide
> going on in the Balkans? What great benefit did "Bush's war" produce?
I guess you didn't mind when Sad gassed the Kurds and the Delta
people. Didn't mind when he lowered decedents feet first into the
wood chopper; feet first, because it took them longer to die. Was
that reason enough to invade Iraq, probably not. Bush is a liar and
an ass but he is president because the Democrats ran someone of lower
stature against him. Our elections are a joke. Both parties only
nominate people they can control, people who will do them personal
good, and not the best person for the job. In fact, as it turns out,
the worst possible person for the job. Now the Dems are running
someone who is left of Ted Kennedy for criss sake. Wants to take away
every bodies money and make a socialized nation. The Republicans shot
some steroids into a corpse and put him up to take the fall this
election. The plan is working perfectly. Idiots like you think it is
Democrats vers Republicans, it=92s not.
|
