On Jul 5, 10:34=A0pm, gringo <gri...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Monkey Clumps wrote:
> > On Jul 3, 1:17 am, gringo <gri...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> Monkey Clumps wrote:
>
> >>> On Jul 2, 12:49 am, gringo <gri...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > <SNIP> loving tribute to Gringo's hero: Dictator Hugo Chazev
>
> >> Evidence of that has been given before Congress. Oil company execs
> >> answer when asked how much their personal earnings were: "I don't
know=
.."
> >> I myself have provided these threads with evidence enough to convince
> >> cheney that he is indeed a s***bag. What you choose to ignore is your
> >> business. But remember, "ignore" is the base for the word "ignorant."
>
> > Interesting that you change the subject to executive compensation,
> > which has nothing to do with the rest of this thread. =A0I guess
you've
> > given up trying to defend your crackpot conspiracy theories about oil
> > companies hoarding oil. =A0That's probably for the best because only
th=
e
> > most braindead of liberals would buy into that load of bull****.
>
> Duplicitous that you accuse me of changing the subject. =A0Everything
> connected to the oil business is relevant to a thread about the oil
> business. =A0But here:
This is not a thread about "the oil business", its a thread about
"Democrats Again Preventing America From Drilling for Oil", dumbass.
Can't you read?
>
> Oil companies know for a fact that oil exists in lands that Federal and
> State regulations won't allow them to drill on *because they have
> already extensively explored those lands.*
Wrong, fool. The USGS has re****ted on ANWR, the oil companies have
not drilled it. If they had been allowed we would have a much better
idea of exactly how much oil is there.
>=A0It is logical, money clump,
> don't you think, that if they have explored--and proved oil exists on
> lands they are not permitted to use--then they have also explored and
> proved the existence of oil on the 68,000 acres =A0they have already
> leased. =A0
After they leased the 68,000 acres they probably did do thorough
exploratory drilling, and found out there wasn't much there, which is
why that area is not being put into production.
> Therefore, doofus, my most relevant point is made, that they
> should first drill on the 68,000 acres they have paid to lease and paid
> to get permits for.
Dumbass, those 68,000 acres do not hold anywhere near the deposits of
ANWR and nobody who knows anything about oil is saying otherwise. If
they did, they would be in production right now. That's just the way
it is. If we want more domestic oil, we need to open up the areas
where the oil is. Places like ANWR. Period. The 68,000 acres crap
is just a red herring that the democrats have thrown out in
desperation since they know they are on the wrong side of this
argument.
> That they will not proof aplenty that the oil companies are in fact
> hoarding oil they could be pumping.
The only "proof aplenty" that we have is that you are a complete
idiot.
|
